THE Loch Ness Monster’s existence is “plausible”, scientists have said after a breakthrough discovery.
Those who believe in the mythical monster say she could be an animal similar to a plesiosaur – a large, long-necked marine reptile which lived between 215 million and 66m years ago. Like the rest of the dinosaurs, these creatures have been extinct ever since.
Over the years many experts have questioned whether a plesiosaur-style creature would have been able to survive in Loch Ness’s fresh water, as the prehistoric beast lived in saltwater.
But researchers at the Universities of Bath and Portsmouth, and University Hassan II in Morocco, have discovered small plesiosaur fossils in a 100m-year-old freshwater river system in the Sahara Desert.
The group of scientists found bones and teeth from adult plesiosaurs, as well as an arm bone from a baby one.
Evidence now suggests that these long-gone reptiles lived and fed in freshwater – changing the game for Nessie believers.
READ MORE: Remembering Scotland's great Nessie April Fool's Day joke
The University of Bath said that the existence of Nessie may be “plausible” – but they warned that all available evidence suggests plesiosaurs died out long ago.
“Plesiosaurs weren’t confined to the seas, they did inhabit freshwater,” they said the evidence demonstrated. “But the fossil record also suggests that after almost 150m years, the last plesiosaurs finally died out at the same time as the dinosaurs, 66m years ago.”
David Martill, co-author of the group’s paper in Cretaceous Research, said: “What amazes me is that the ancient Moroccan river contained so many carnivores all living alongside each other.
“This was no place to go for a swim.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel