THE Scottish Sovereignty Research Group (SSRG) hosted a groundbreaking cross-party conference, Empowering the Nation, in Dunfermline over the weekend.
It was the first major conference to be held since the First Minister’s announcement of a date for the next independence referendum and the first subsequent chance for independence supporters to address publicly many of the key issues and constitutional questions currently facing Scotland.
All of Scotland’s political parties were invited and more than 250 delegates attended the event in the Carnegie Conference Centre, with 130-plus people taking part online.
Early feedback has been very positive with delegates praising the positive way in which the 22 strong line-up of well-known speakers led wide-ranging debates on Scotland’s future from all aspects – academic, technical, populist and political; under the devolved settlement and as a self-reliant sovereign nation.
SSRG team member David Henry said his two highlights of the weekend was when conference delegate Sally Hughes stood on Sunday and said: “More than anything you put into the collective consciousness of the English people just how much they are robbing us of our assets, our countries assets, it is beyond debate, it becomes a matter of reality, it becomes a very powerful political tool, but it empowers them to sort out these bastards down in Westminster”.
The second was when Gareth Wardell (aka Grouse Beater) made a surprise appearance on Saturday which electrified the audience.
The first debate of many over the weekend focused on the potential routes to independence – and established a clear consensus that action needs to be taken urgently in parallel on a number of fronts.
Many agreed that to be able resolve the economic and social damage being imposed on us by the actions of the Westminster government, Scotland needs to fully exercise our constitutional rights domestically and internationally as a sovereign nation.
READ MORE: The question of an independent Scotland's currency answered in 40 seconds
One of the many highlights over the weekend was the session on strategic infrastructure and trade where the gaps, weaknesses and the strategic decisions of the UK Government were explored, with the resulting under-development in Scotland’s road, rail, aviation and maritime infrastructure exposed by Professor Alf Baird and Iain Cameron. The likely social and economic benefits achievable in these areas in an independent Scotland were the subject of considerable debate with conference delegates.
There were significant contributions by Professor Richard Murphy and Dr Tim Rideout on Scotland’s economy and proposals for a Scottish Currency with a wide-ranging debate on some quite technical issues.
On a slightly lighter note, delegates enjoyed taking part in a novel experiment over the weekend led by the Scottish Currency Group, which advocates the introduction of a Scottish currency as soon as possible after independence.
A “Scottish Central Bank” and a “bureau de change” booth were set up during the conference to illustrate the introduction of a new currency. The conference virtually became a “sterling-free zone” for three days so that all attendees could use newly-designed Scottish currency for any purchases they made at the venue.
The concluding session, led by Dr Mark McNaught, saw Douglas Chapman MP (above), Neale Hanvey MP, and Sara Salyers deliver an inspiring open and honest debate with hard-hitting questions from attendees.
Alba MP Hanvey said: “As a Yesser, I think if we are going to have a plebiscite election and it’s going to be a single issue, it needs to be conducted as the Yes movement rather than any political party.”
“It’s not about going down to Westminster to ask for a negotiation ... what we have to do is have the guts and gumption to go down and say “right, meeting now, we are going to negotiate the withdrawal from the Treaty of Union.
“We have to be much less timid.”
The SNP’s Chapman said: “If you’re standing on a platform a plebiscite election then I think it would need to be some sort of alliance candidate structure that you would need to have there.”
There was respectful disagreement among delegates and speakers on tactics and timing, but a meeting of minds and a shared understanding of what preparations and actions need to be taken by individuals and different groups across Scotland, now and in the coming months, to increase political momentum and ensure we achieve our goal of Scottish independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel