KEIR Starmer has been “hoist on his own petard” after it was revealed he had breached the code of conduct for MPs eight times.
The breaches concerned gifts from football clubs and companies, as well as the sale of a plot of land worth more than £100,000, which were not declared on time.
The Labour leader – who allies described as “Mr Rules” while he was being investigated for potential lockdown breaches (he was later cleared) – was found to have broken the rules a total of eight times by a parliament sleaze watchdog.
Before he was cleared of wrongdoing by Durham Police, Starmer found himself subject to accusations of hypocrisy by Tory MPs because he had demanded Boris Johnson resign when the Prime Minister found himself under police investigation.
The Labour leader has been accused of over-emphasising character over policy in his battle to oust the Conservatives from power, Alba has said.
READ MORE: Sunak boasts of diverting money from ‘deprived urban areas’ in unearthed clip
Chris McEleny, the party’s general secretary, said: “Starmer chose to focus on personalities over the past two years over policy so he will be hoist with his own petard on this issue.
“It is clearer every day that it doesn’t matter who the next Prime Minister is, they will be completely out of touch with the cost of living crisis that people are living with.
“Meanwhile, Scots are asking themselves why are energy bills soaring when we live in an energy-rich nation that generates enough electricity to power every home from renewables and we are self-sufficient in oil and gas.
“London Labour and the Tories only care about protecting capital and winning support in the south-east of England, whereas ours is a movement to protect the interests of the people of Scotland and to win their hearts and minds to regain our independence as an immediate priority.”
The SNP said this exposed Labour's "staggering hypocrisy".
Kirsten Oswald MP told The National: “The hypocrisy from Labour in recent days has been staggering.
READ MORE: 'Excruciating' moment as Kay Burley exposes Liz Truss's endless U-turns
“While branch office manager Anas Sarwar has been busy issuing papers on transparency, his bosses in London clearly didn’t bother reading it following the numerous breaches of the code of conduct by Keir Starmer.”
Starmer was investigated by Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone, who found he had broken the rules eight times – five more counts than he had originally been accused of in the initial complaint against him.
She said the breaches were “minor and/or inadvertent, and that there was no deliberate attempt to mislead” and so did not refer him to the Committee on Standards, which happens in more serious cases.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “Keir Starmer takes his responsibilities to the Register very seriously and has apologised to the Commissioner for this inadvertent error.
“He has assured the Commissioner that his office processes have been reviewed to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel