RORY Stewart has been accused of having a “victim complex” after claiming the SNP “bullied” Unionists and accused them of “betraying” Scotland.
Michael Russell hit back at comments made by former Tory minister Rory Stewart on his podcast The Rest Is Politics, in which he said the SNP treated Unionists “as if we have very little right to speak about this and that we don’t understand Scotland and that we are somehow betraying the Scottish people”.
Stewart, who hosts the podcast with former Labour spin doctor Alastair Campbell (below), argued with his co-presenter over whether the Scottish Government had a “mandate” to hold a second referendum.
He said the SNP’s 2019 General Election results were not enough to justify holding a second vote on Scotland’s future but made no reference to the pro-independence majority secured in the 2021 Holyrood election.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson dances to Rangers anthem Sweet Caroline at wedding bash in cringe-inducing clip
While conceding the SNP had picked up 45% of the vote, Stewart said this did not make up “the majority of the Scottish people”.
His comments were skewered on Twitter by nationalism researcher Mark McGeoghegan, who said: “Still no suggestion of what constitutes a democratic mandate, but Rory's implication - that only majority support for a single party does - was ridiculous.
“Has no UK Government since 1931 had a democratic mandate?”
Speaking on the podcast, released on Thursday, Stewart said: “I’m talking to you from Scotland and it is an incredibly fraught issue and people like myself, who are proud to be Scottish and are in Scotland are treated by the SNP as if we have very little right to speak about this and that we don’t understand Scotland and that we are somehow betraying the Scottish people because we’re not on their side.
They returned to this in yesterday's @RestIsPolitics. Still no suggestion of what constitutes a democratic mandate, but Rory's implication - that only majority support for a single party does - was ridiculous.
— Mark McGeoghegan 🌻 (@markmcgeoghegan) August 5, 2022
Has no UK government since 1931 had a democratic mandate? https://t.co/Gs0YFecQYh
“And I feel very, strongly that I and the majority of Scottish people expressed clearly in a referendum that we’re proud to be Scottish but we’re also proud to be part of the United Kingdom and we’re not going to be bullied and intimidated into feeling that in order to be Scottish you need to want to rip the United Kingdom apart.”
SNP chief Russell branded his comments “nonsense” and pointed out Stewart had been part of a government which “actively harmed” Scotland.
He told The National: “The kindest thing you could say about Rory is, he’s good at self-publicity.
READ MORE: SNP were forced into action on indyref2 court battle by 'apostate' Lord Advocate, MacAskill says
“This is nonsense. It’s perfectly possible to have a civilised conversation about this but it’s up to him to justify why he is backing things that are doing positive harm to Scotland.”
The Scottish Government says the 2021 Holyrood election result gives it a mandate to legislate to hold a second referendum.
Announcing the battle plan for indyref2 earlier this year, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she wanted to take the argument out of the political sphere by sending the referendum bill to the Supreme Court, which will rule on whether it is lawful.
Russell added: “If he could prove himself to be a democrat then he might be worth listening to but this victim complex when he’s trying to argue against democracy devalues the whole thing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel