THE idea of Scottish independence is “not very nice” as it would mean “perpetual Conservatism at Westminster”, Labour's deputy leader has said.
Angela Rayner was speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale during a show at the Edinburgh Fringe when she made the comments.
The UK Labour deputy leader further claimed that she did not want to be “anywhere near” a second independence referendum because the Brexit vote had been “enough” for her.
Rayner, who represents Ashton-under-Lyne at Westminster, suggested independence would see Scotland “leave behind” people in her constituency.
READ MORE: Labour won't set out democratic route to indyref2, Jackie Baillie insists
She told the Edinburgh crowd: “It’s not a possibility that we would work with the SNP – we want to win a majority.
“I don’t think the people of Scotland should leave behind the people of Ashton-under-Lyne, either.
“The poverty that we face is the poverty they face and we both need a Labour government in order to make the changes that we need to make, whether that’s in Scotland or in England.”
When asked about the likelihood of winning seats north of the Border in the next election, Rayner claimed the party was “making progress”.
“Respect is earned, it’s not given and I think we’ve been making progress to earn that respect,” she said.
“But I think breaking up the Union is not the answer.
“Leaving us to perpetual Conservatism at Westminster is not very nice … but actually having a Labour government could make all the difference.”
Labour currently has only one MP in Scotland, Ian Murray (below) in Edinburgh South.
Rayner went on to say that the Labour Party was “behind” on devolution, adding that “actually engaging with devolution could be the key”.
She continued: “Scotland is absolutely key, it’s key to Manchester, it’s key to the whole of the United Kingdom.
“I’m against us going anywhere near a second referendum, if I’m honest. I think the Brexit referendum was enough for me.”
When asked if her position showed “disrespect” to the people who voted for the SNP or Scottish Greens in last year’s Holyrood elections, Rayner pushed back.
“I wouldn’t say it’s me showing disrespect, I’d say it was me being honest as a politician with people,” she said.
“You can disagree with me on that position – and that’s completely fine … but I think it’s better for Scotland and I think it’s better for my constituency that we’re part of the Union, but I think it’s also equally important that we don’t have the Conservatives in power in Westminster – I think that is the biggest damage that’s being done in Scotland.”
Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain QC last month referred a prospective referendum bill to the Supreme Court in a bid to ascertain if it was within the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
Oral arguments will be presented to the court on October 11 and 12.
Meanwhile, the deputy leader also said that her party was still struggling to communicate the “detail of Brexit” to the country.
The event in Scotland’s capital was also interrupted by environmental campaigners from the group Green New Deal Rising, who asked to meet with Rayner, but were shouted down by members of the audience.
Four campaigners held up a banner during the final minutes of the show, while another videoed their exchange with the leader.
The campaigner recording the disruption was removed by security.
In response to a question from the campaigners, Rayner stressed the need to tax the profits of oil and gas firms such as BP – which reported a profit of £6.9 billion in the second quarter of this year – as well as building green industries across the country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel