TIME is fast running out to fill in a consultation on whether anti-protest buffer zones should be put in place around abortion clinics in Scotland.
People have until 23:59 on Thursday to make their voices heard on Gillian Mackay's Safe Access Zones private member's bill which, if passed, will mean anti-choice protestors cannot hold demonstrations within 150m of a clinic.
There has been a significant rise in the number of demonstrations held outside the likes of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and Sandyford Clinic in Glasgow and the Chalmers Clinics in Edinburgh.
Nobody should be harassed when accessing healthcare.
— Scottish Greens (@scottishgreens) August 11, 2022
This is the last day to respond to @GillianMacMSP's consultation on introducing buffer zones outside facilities that provide abortion services.
Fill it in by 23:59 to make sure your voice is heard.https://t.co/NaG86Ksp7o pic.twitter.com/afWOSZJvNe
Religious anti-choice activists also hold “vigils” outside places offering abortions, which are protected under the rights of freedom of expression and religion.
Several MSPs across a range of parties have already shown their support for the Bill including Patrick Harvie, Pam Duncan-Glancy, Jackie Baillie, Emma Roddick, and Paul O'Kane.
First Minister Nicola Strugeon has also backed the cause and held an abortion summit in June to start up talks on how councils could help to stop protestors coming too close to clinics in their area.
READ MORE: Labour take control of North Lanarkshire council from SNP thanks to BUP vote
It has now been announced there will be a second summit this month which will focus more on how local authorities can implement buffer zones outside using local regulations.
At the June summit, Nicola Sturgeon called on Glasgow and Edinburgh to introduce buffer zones to restrict protest outside sensitive sites such as hospitals and sexual health clinics.
She said at the time: “Glasgow and Edinburgh clearly are the councils where this is the biggest issue, although there are other health boards who are seeing these protests."
Last month Mackay said the consultation has received around 5000 completed responses with just under four weeks until it was due to close.
It could reach the heights of some of the most popular bill surveys, hitting between 10,000 and 12,000 replies.
To make sure your views are considered, fill in the consultation here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel