RISHI Sunak has lauched a series of promises to tackle the cost-of-living crisis as he seeks to gain ground on his rival in the Tory leadership contest.
The former chancellor has said he is prepared to find up to £10 billion of extra support for those facing rising bills in the autumn – with a vision to cover the total cost for up to 16 million vulnerable people, according to The Times.
It said he valued his cut to VAT on energy at £5bn, and would find the same amount again to go towards helping the most in need, as he warned: “You can’t heat your home with hope.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon reveals cost-of-living package, saying inaction will cost lives
Writing for the newspaper, Sunak said: “People need reassurance now about what we will do and I make no apology for concentrating on what matters most.”
It comes after the former chancellor claimed his rival’s cost-of-living plans could put vulnerable people at risk of “real destitution”, with economic policy once again driving a wedge between the candidates.
As the pair took to the stage for the latest party hustings in Cheltenham, the former chancellor said that without further direct payments, pensioners and those on very low incomes could face serious hardship.
But Liz Truss stood by her tax-cutting plans, warning against “Gordon Brown economics”, as she said “you take money off people in taxes and give it back in benefits”.
Asked at the hustings whether she was for or against “handouts”, Truss stressed that her “first preference” has always been to “reduce taxes”.
She has previously hinted she would consider further support for struggling households if made prime minister, but insisted she will not “write the Budget in advance”.
On Friday morning, Truss supporter Therese Coffey insisted that “every option”, including handouts, will be considered when it comes to support with the cost of living.
Work and Pensions Secretary Coffey said: “Absolutely, every option will be considered in terms of support schemes that may be needed, whether it is a targeted way or the general way of removing that national insurance increase which Liz is absolutely committed to do in an emergency budget.
“People are going to get help. I think it is about what change in help may be needed, but help is already being given and will be given in the future as well.”
With a dire new warning that energy bills could top £5000 by the spring, the cost-of-living issue continues to dominate the exchanges in the battle to succeed Boris Johnson.
The Times said Sunak would offer specific support to pensioners and those on benefits because they “simply cannot increase their incomes to meet their energy costs and are the most vulnerable in society”.
Universal Credit, winter fuel payments and similar schemes could be used to ease the burden.
Sunak also refused to rule out “some limited and temporary one-off borrowing as a last resort to get us through this winter”.
While Truss stressed she was keen to cut taxes, Sunak warned at Thursday’s hustings the country “will never ever forgive us” if the Conservatives do not provide “direct support” to millions of pensioners.
READ MORE: Non-violent protest can inspire hope in the face of Westminster's failure
“No tax cut, and Liz’s tax plan, is not going to help those groups of people,” he said.
“So scrapping the health and social care levy, as she wants to do, is worth £1700 to her on her salary.
“For someone working really hard on the national living wage, it’s worth just over a quid a week. And for someone who’s a pensioner, without any earnings, it’s worth zero.
“Now I want to provide direct support to those groups of people.”
He said it would be a “moral failure” not to do this, suggesting Truss’s vision could put people at risk of serious hardship.
“If you support a plan that Liz is suggesting, which says she doesn’t believe in doing that, doesn’t believe in providing direct financial support to those groups of people… we are going to, as a Conservative government, leave millions of incredibly vulnerable people at the risk of real destitution,” he said.
Quizzed on the billions of profit made by energy giants, Truss said she would ensure companies in an oligopoly were held to account.
But she insisted that profit is not a “dirty word”, and argued that it being treated as such is “a massive problem”.
She also said she would “absolutely” not support a windfall tax, claiming it is a “Labour idea”.
“It’s all about bashing business, and it sends the wrong message to international investors and to the public,” she said.
Separately, Truss resisted suggestions she might be modelling herself on former prime minister Margaret Thatcher, insisting: “I am my own person.”
“Don’t get me wrong, I’m a massive fan of Thatcher, but we live in different times,” she said.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon reveals what it was like to work with Boris Johnson
Earlier on Thursday, representatives of major electricity companies arrived in Downing Street for crisis talks as analyst, Auxilione, said regulator Ofgem could be forced to raise the price cap for the average household to £5038 from next April.
However the meeting failed to produce any immediate concrete help for struggling consumers, with Boris Johnson acknowledging any “significant fiscal decisions” would be be a matter for his successor.
Instead the Prime Minister was reduced to urging the companies to act “in the national interest”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel