P&O Ferries has been accused of acting like a “corporate gangster” for celebrating record profits just months after it sacked 800 UK-based workers without notice.
DP World, which owns the firm, said that it had made a profit of 884 million dollars (£736m) over the six months to the end of June.
It was an increase of more than 51% over the year as the business said it had focused on shipping cargo with higher profit margins.
“We are delighted to report a record set of first half results,” said chair and chief executive Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson puts plush London house on the market for £1.6m
“This significant growth demonstrates that our strategy to focus on high margin cargo and to offer customised supply chain solutions will provide sustainable returns in the long term.”
Frances O’Grady (above), the secretary general of the Trades Union Congress, called on the Government to scrap all its contracts with DP World.
“DP World have been allowed to get away scot-free with behaving like corporate gangsters,” she said.
“These eye-watering profits have come off the back of P&O illegally sacking hundreds of dedicated staff. They are an insult to common decency.
“Ministers should have stripped DP world of all their lucrative public contracts and severed all commercial ties with the company.
“But now they too are using the P&O playbook.
“Having slammed P&O for replacing experienced workers with agency staff, Grant Shapps has passed laws that will allow employers to bus in agency workers during strikes.
READ MORE: Profit might not be a dirty word, but profiteering certainly is
“At a time when the cost of living is soaring and wages are falling, the Conservative government wants to make it much harder for people to win better pay and conditions.”
P&O Ferries sparked public anger and was hauled in front of MPs to answer questions when it sacked hundreds of workers without notice in March.
During the hearings in Parliament the business admitted that it had broken the law that would have forced them to give notice of the firings.
This was because no unions would have accepted its new proposals, bosses said at the time.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel