LIZ Truss has been accused of delaying an annual report on human rights because it is likely to criticise Rwanda’s human rights record.
The Foreign Office’s report was due before the Westminster parliamentary summer recess and is now the most delayed ever.
Critics have accused the Foreign Secretary of holding up the publication in an attempt to quash criticism of Rwanda, the country which Truss wants to send some migrants to on a one-way ticket.
Her opponents also say it could be because the Tory leadership hopeful is too focused on the race against Rishi Sunak to become the next prime minister.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss hugely unpopular in Scotland, Ipsos poll show
Lord Wood of Anfield, a Labour peer and member of the House of Lords international relations committee, said: “At best, this is another example of how the business of government has ground to a halt while Liz Truss is engaged in her acrimonious contest with Rishi Sunak.
"At worst, I suspect it is a cynical attempt by the foreign secretary to delay scrutiny over what the report says about Rwanda.
"Either way, there is no good reason for this unprecedented delay.”
SNP MP and shadow home secretary Stuart McDonald told The National: "This is a disgraceful, illegal, and inhumane policy that will achieve nothing but a massive bill for the taxpayer.
"Given the Home Office has been busy trying to suppress publication of key documents critical of the policy, it is entirely understandable that people will be cynical about the late release of this report.
"Liz Truss should ensure the report is published immediately.”
MSP Maggie Chapman said the Rwanda policy is "shameful" and said it was "obvious" why Truss would want the report delayed.
She told The National: "The cruel and racist deportation flights are a disgrace. They are reflective of a UK Government that has absolutely no interest in or care about human rights.
"Liz Truss's support for the regime in Rwanda is characteristic of a shameful and hypocritical foreign policy that puts self-interest before human rights and lives.
"It is obvious why she would want to delay the report, when it criticises many of the despots, dictatorships and abusers that she has spent her time arming and supporting as Foreign Secretary.
"With independence we can take a different approach. We can end Scotland's role in the damage that is being inflicted from Downing Street and instead follow a foreign policy with human rights and solidarity at its heart."
It comes after court papers showed that the UK’s high commissioner to Rwanda warned against the UK Government scheme because the country “has been accused of recruiting refugees to conduct armed operations in neighbouring countries”.
The Foreign Office’s human rights report is expected to further add to this criticism.
Its last report said “critical voices continued to face heavy restrictions” in the nation.
READ MORE: P&O Ferries owner DP World reports record profits months after sacking 800 UK staff
It is usually published between March and June.
A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: “We will publish the annual human rights and democracy report in due course.”
The Commons Home Affairs Committee previously found there is “no evidence” that the policy is acting as a deterrent to English Channel crossings.
Opposition parties and charities have hit out at the policy as "abhorrent" while SNP shadow home secretary Stuart McDonald MP said: "it is a cataclysmic waste of taxpayers’ money".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here