NEXT month will mark 25 years since the historic referendum on September 11, 1997, which delivered a huge Yes, Yes for a Scottish Parliament with tax-raising powers.
Less than a fortnight before the poll, Princess Diana died in a crash in a Paris underpass, on August 31, 1997. Some wondered whether the tragedy would affect the result. Neal Ascherson, in his book Stone Voices, recalls that the mourning for Diana was more muted in Scotland than down south, where vast crowds outside Buckingham Palace wept and waved flags. He noted that these were largely St George’s Crosses rather than Union Jacks, in what he saw as a symbolic moment of the re-emergence of an English national consciousness.
Campaigners had to hold their breath and suspend activity for a week. This delayed the start of a “bus party”, which Ascherson helped to organise with the late novelist William McIlvanney, which was now pushed to just a few days before the vote.
The bus went around Scotland, bringing poets, writers and musicians to town and school halls across the country to engage more people in the conversation.
On board was musician Mairi Campbell with her husband Dave Francis and tiny daughter Ada. Ascherson wrote of a meeting in the hall at Gala Academy: “After the talking, we gathered around the school piano and a ceilidh developed. A choir of middle-aged Galashiels businessmen sang Border ballads. Mairi sang The Broom O’ The Cowdenknowes in her light, poignant voice … I saw tears on old Borders faces around me.”
A quarter of a century later, Mairi and daughter Ada Francis, now also a musician, are appearing together in the Edinburgh Fringe in a show called She/Her presented by Brian Cox and directed by his wife Nicole Ansari-Cox. It features a cast of powerful women performing stories from their lives.
Campbell feels devolution has achieved much since the Scottish Parliament was reconvened, two years after the referendum, but she longs for Scotland to take the next step into independence. “We need to reboot the operating system of the UK, and Scotland has to lead the way,” she said. Campbell looks forward to a strong, feisty Scotland of diverse languages, cultures and ways of being.
She recalls of her bus party stint: “I felt that the people who were opposed to a Scottish Parliament were lacking in confidence. They just didn’t believe that Scotland could run its own affairs. There is a kind of natural human desire to be on the side of the powerful and they saw that as being down in London – but it’s not.”
Back in 1997, on September 10, the eve of the vote, the bus tour ended at the Vigil For A Scottish Parliament, where doughty campaigners sat and sang and talked around a brazier, day and night for five years in a perpetual protest called Democracy For Scotland.
In 1992, John Major had been elected in a surprise fourth general election win for the Conservatives. Major was resolutely opposed to anything approaching devolution or what was called Home Rule For Scotland. Now is not the time, he said – or words to that effect.
Many in Scotland were devastated by this shock result, particularly as exit polls had predicted a Labour victory. Once again, Scotland was to be ruled by a Government it did not vote for. Three in four voters in Scotland had voted for parties that promised a Scottish Parliament. This didn’t feel like democracy to many.
That night, hundreds of protesters met outside Edinburgh’s Royal High School – a putative site for the new Parliament – and began a vigil. Originally planned just for a weekend, they kept the protest going, come rain, come snow, for the next five years.
When the bus party arrived at the foot of Calton Hill, the night before the vote, the tally on the portacabin counting the time the vigil had lasted read “1979 days”. That was a coincidence – it was in 1979 that the first referendum for a Scottish Parliament was held. Back then, although the vote was a majority for Yes, an amendment had been inserted demanding that 40% of all the names on the electoral roll would have to vote for it.
Many Scots felt cheated by this clause, which led to the claim that “even the dead had a vote” – because the roll is always somewhat out of date.
But that very high bar was actually met in 1997. The referendum was unusual in having two questions, but there was strong support for both. Every council area said Yes to a Scottish Parliament, with 75% of the vote. Around 84% of voters in Glasgow and West Dunbartonshire said Yes. Only two areas had a marginal No to tax-raising powers – Orkney and Dumfries & Galloway.
At a celebration to mark 30 years since the vigil’s beginning, earlier this year, members of the loose collective reminisced about the number of people who stopped by, donated or just beeped their horns to express support. On September 10, it seemed everyone was beeping – even passing police cars.
There was opposition to devolution, but it was much less vociferous than in 1979. The No campaign in 1997 was called Think Twice and was without much high-profile support. At the General Election in May 1997, a Labour Party led by Tony Blair swept to power. The Conservatives lost all of their 11 Scottish seats. Ascherson records in Stone Voices that the Scottish Conservatives were “still shattered” by that. “They were sick of being abused as anti-Scottish, and they declined to grant Think Twice the party’s official support.”
Labour, the LibDems and the SNP all supported a Scottish Parliament in 1997. There were some on the centre-right in Scotland who also campaigned for a Yes vote.
Michael Fry toured the North East on behalf of his organisation Wealthy Nation, arguing that Scotland needed Home Rule to become a more thriving, prosperous country. He recalled: “My support for independence was rooted in my Conservatism. I felt that Scotland should run its own affairs, I actually felt that even if it was a failure, it would be our failure.”
The main concerns about devolution were familiar. Ascherson summarised them as fears that “maybe our small nation of Scotland no longer has the brains, skill and political energy to govern itself”.
McIlvanney stated: “It is an act of self-belief to vote for this Parliament. And that was the bus party’s line through all this, a line which no politician could dare to take. Yes, of course, this is a leap into the dark …we are asking you to take a risk and it is not a quantifiable risk. As Lech Walesa said when the Solidarity revolution began in Poland, ‘Our only guarantee is ourselves.’”
The bus party debated seriously with the schoolchildren who would vote for the first time in the new Scottish Parliament.
Ascherson pondered: “They would be first-time voters at the elections for the Parliament of Scotland. If they gave any thought at all to the struggle which had brought it about, they might wonder why it had taken so long, why it had required so many false starts and hesitations to bring about something which to them was so normal and so obviously necessary.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel