CAMPAIGNERS have slammed the approval of funding for a new multibillion-pound nuclear power station.
Boris Johnson has greenlit financial support for the plant, which will be partly funded by the taxpayer, in a move campaigners have branded “dodgy”.
The Stop Sizewell C campaign group said: “Whatever way you look at it, this is a very dodgy decision. Has it been made by a lame duck PM who is not supposed to tie the hands of his successor, or was it in fact made before Sizewell C was granted planning consent, lending serious weight to our conviction that this was a prejudiced, political decision?
“Our next prime minister should call Sizewell C in, there are so many better ways to spend billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money than on a project that won’t light a single lightbulb for at least a decade.”
Whitehall sources confirmed to the PA news agency that the Prime Minister and Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi have given the go-ahead for financing for the construction of the Sizewell C nuclear reactor in Suffolk.
Private funding will be sought for the project estimated to cost £20-30 billion.
The Government is then set to make a final decision on public investment early next year, with it expected to buy a 20% stake in the plant, costing up to £6bn.
Truss camp fears move could tie future PM's hands
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng, who is tipped to be Truss’s chancellor if she wins the Tory leadership race, is said to be “massively” on board with the plan.
But her camp did not appear to be united on the issue, with Chief Secretary to the Treasury Simon Clarke raising concerns with Johnson and Zahawi.
In a letter leaked to the Sunday Times, Clarke suggested that acting now would tie the hands of their successors.
Clarke, who is expected to get a senior Cabinet job if Truss wins, said the costs of Sizewell C are “sufficient to materially affect spending and fiscal choices for an incoming government, especially in the context of wider pressures on the public finances”.
While essentially a caretaker Prime Minister after being forced to resign over a succession of scandals, Johnson previously said he would not be making major decisions before leaving office.
Truss, the frontrunner to replace Johnson on September 6, has pledged tax cuts, including a reversal of the national insurance hike costing at least £30bn per year.
But she is under growing pressure to offer further support to the most vulnerable, as experts warn the energy price cap could surpass £6,000 in April in a further painful hike.
'Crack on with nuclear'
Kwarteng, in an article for the Mail On Sunday, promised “help is coming” but insisted it is “entirely reasonable not to detail the exact shape of that support” until later.
He also claimed it was necessary to “crack on with more nuclear power stations” in order to increase Britain’s energy security.
Development consent for Sizewell C was given the go-ahead by Kwarteng in July, but negotiations over the financial investment decision were ongoing.
A Government spokeswoman said: “Nuclear power has a key role to play as we work to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and exposure to volatile global gas prices.
“Negotiations are still ongoing on Sizewell C and as these are active and commercially sensitive discussions we cannot comment further.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel