ALEX Salmond has called for the case for independence to be heard by international bodies.
On a tour of Catalonia, the former first minister argued for both it and Scotland to prepare further presentations on their cases for independence to international authorities, as part of a bid to mobilise international support for the two causes.
Salmond argued that this practice had been “done throughout history”.
He added: “Scotland has been presenting its case to international authority since the Declaration of Arbroath of 1320, while Catalonia made a sustained attempt to seek UN recognition at the very dawn of the United Nations in 1945.
“However, neither Scotland in 2014, nor Catalonia after the October 1 poll of 2017, were able to mobilise substantial international support. In contrast, Unionist governments in both countries were able to use the state networks of other countries as part of their campaigns of fear and intimidation.
“This must change before the next electoral tests in both countries. The new independence movements should prepare their strong cases, legal and political, to take to international authority and world opinion.”
READ MORE: Support for rejoining the EU skyrockets among voters in Scotland
Earlier last weekend, Salmond addressed the 54th International Conference of the Universitat Catalana d’Estiu.
During the speech, he reflected on the progress that Catalonia, Scotland and Ireland had made towards their goals of full independence over the last century.
Salmond said: “A century ago, Ireland was ruled (in titular form at least) by the last Lord Lieutenant as it had been more or less since the Norman invasion of England. Fifty years ago, Catalonia was emerging from fascist repression and twenty-five years ago Scotland had a quasi-colonial administration composed of politicians from the least successful parliamentary political party in the country.
“This Catalonia is autonomous, Scotland devolved, and Ireland independent, albeit still partitioned. In all three the struggle for full independence continues but that should not blind us to the progress that has been made.”
Salmond went on to outline seven requirements that would make the eventual success of these movements possible.
Salmond’s seven requirements
- To build and develop a vibrant national culture, this is something Salmond says all three nations have succeeded in doing.
- Stick to a peaceful constitutional pathway of finding independence, regardless of state provocations.
- To develop a detailed picture of what independence will mean for each nation and its society, rather than justify it as an act in itself.
- Build as large a communication network amongst independence organisations as possible to strengthen the ability to assert democracy against state power. Of all the three nations, Salmond says Scotland is the worst placed in reaching this goal due to Unionist influence over mainstream media.
- Keep national movements responsive to social and economic changes so that they can continue to propose alternative solutions to headline issues. He listed the economic recovery from the pandemic, inflation, climate change and the Russian invasion of Ukraine as examples.
- Maintain confidence in devolved polities as structures than can allow pro-independence parties to develop the ability to run a state.
- Hold leaders accountable for providing the strategy and circumstances where success for the goals of independence is possible. Salmond claimed that “Nothing is worse than raising expectations and failing to carry through”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel