FORMER BBC journalist Jon Sopel has said the BBC “ducked” reporting on the full consequences of Brexit after it was accused of having a bias in favour of the UK staying in the EU.
In an interview with The Observer, Sopel recalled being on a trip to the UK with Barack Obama, who was flying over to influence the Brexit vote.
Sopel was asked by a BBC editor why his report did not mention Nigel Farage, who was then the leader of Ukip.
Sopel, formerly the BBC's North America editor, told the paper: “I said: 'I don’t think Nigel Farage was on the plane'.”
READ MORE: BBC Scotland accused of 'making excuses' for Liz Truss with framing of Sturgeon insult
The Observer interview was conducted with Emily Maitlis, with whom Sopel hosts a daily news podcast for Global – the group behind LBC and Classic FM.
The BBC has previously come under fire in the past for its coverage of Brexit and the impact it has had on the UK.
The SNP’s president Michael Russell took issue with an article titled “What is the UK’s inflation rate and why is the cost of living going up?”
The article said that surging energy bills were linked to the war in Ukraine and that rising petrol prices and increasing food costs were some of the reasons behind inflation but failed to mention Brexit.
Former No 10 communications boss Alastair Campbell previously told The National that there may have been “some sort of policy decision” to reduce the mention of Brexit in the broadcaster’s reporting.
In another story published in February, the BBC reported on the “major staff recruitment and retention challenges” facing NHS Scotland but once again failed to mention Brexit.
This was despite the Audit Scotland document which was the basis of the report explicitly highlighting how it and previous reports showed “the UK’s departure from the EU could further reduce the pool of workers available.”
Emily Maitlis had several run-ins with BBC management regarding impartiality, the most controversial of which came when she said Dominic Cummings had broken lockdown rules.
She was reprimanded by the broadcaster but told the Press Gazette that it was never explained to her what was inaccurate about her comments.
She told The Observer: “I get nervous when impartiality is used as a way of shutting down journalists.
“Is it because you were asking questions you shouldn’t have been? I don’t think that’s impartiality – that’s censorship.
READ MORE: Indyref2: BBC Scotland 'may be giving false idea of public opinion', SNP say
“And if your journalism is going to suffer by staying somewhere where you cannot ask those questions, what are you doing, right?”
Maitlis is just one of a number of high-profile names to depart the BBC recently.
Veteran journalist Andrew Marr also left to join LBC as he said he wanted to get his “own voice back” as a writer and presenter.
Newsnight's former policy editor Lewis Goodall also left the BBC to join Global.
The BBC director-general Tim Davie has made impartiality a priority since taking on the role in 2020.
He introduced stricter social media rules for presenters, while the corporation has also launched thematic reviews of content to test impartiality.
The BBC were approached but said they had no comment on the matter.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel