ONE of the BBC’s highest paid media personalities, football pundit Gary Lineker, has called out a colleague at the corporation after a public spat over impartiality on social media.
Lineker, who in July was revealed to be the BBC’s top earning on-air talent for the fifth year running, was told off by a journalist at the corporation after he tweeted about sewage being pumped into waterways in England.
Raw sewage was pumped into English rivers and coasts around 800,000 times in the period 2020-2021, according to the Environment Agency.
The BBC football pundit wrote on Twitter: “As a politician how could you ever, under any circumstances, bring yourself to vote for pumping sewage into our seas? Unfathomable!”
As a politician how could you ever, under any circumstances, bring yourself to vote for pumping sewage into our seas? Unfathomable!
— Gary Lineker 💙💛 (@GaryLineker) August 22, 2022
In the public row that followed, BBC journalist Neil Henderson suggested Lineker should “get off” the broadcaster if he was not prepared to be impartial.
After Lineker confirmed that the two likely had different contracts, giving the former footballer the “freedom to tweet about this sort of thing”, Henderson replied: “Does not our duty of impartiality apply across the BBC?”
Lineker responded: “Only in news and current affairs. Surely you know this?”
Henderson wrote back: “The BBC lives or dies by its impartiality. If you can’t abide it, get off it.”
The journalist has now deleted his contributions to the Twitter spat, while Lineker’s remain up.
In response to another user on the thread, Lineker said it had been a “very odd attack”. “I’m also freelance,” he added.
READ MORE: BBC journalists getting 'addicted' to Twitter, bosses claim
In September 2020, the BBC’s newly appointed director-general, Tim Davie, made clear that he was prepared to sack presenters who are deemed to breach impartiality rules on social media.
In social media guidance issued the following month, the BBC said employees should follow four key rules in their output.
They were told:
- Not to bring the BBC "into disrepute"
- To maintain impartiality if required: Meaning staff should not "express a personal opinion on matters of public policy, politics or 'controversial subjects'"
- Not to criticise their colleagues in public
- To respect the privacy of the workplace and the confidentiality of internal announcements
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel