KEY arguments for independence are winning round Scottish voters, a new study has found.
Distrust of Westminster and a feeling Scotland is moving in a different direction from England politically are the strongest arguments for ending the Union, research by Ipsos Scotland has shown.
Asked if they found the argument that the people of Scotland want to “take the country in a very different political direction to England”, 59% of respondents said they found this “very” or “fairly” convincing, while only 36% found it “not very” or “not at all” convincing.
Some 58% of the 1000 Scottish adults polled earlier this month found the argument that Westminster would not govern in Scotland’s interests convincing, while 38% took the opposite view.
READ MORE: 'Brass neck' Unionists heckled as public see through bin strike photo op
Brexit also remains a driver of support for independence, with Scotland’s remain vote representing a convincing argument for 53% of voters, while 44% said it was not.
Remainers and Brexiters were even more fiercely split on this question: 63% those who voted to stay found it a convincing argument, while 72% of Leave voters said it was unconvincing.
Plan B doubts
And public opinion is split on plans to hold a “de facto” referendum if the Supreme Court rejects permission to hold indyref2.
Scots are almost evenly divided on whether a General Election could deliver a mandate for independence, the study found.
The “de facto” referendum is the SNP and Greens’ back up strategy if the Scottish Government’s attempt to have a bill legislating for indyref2 cleared by the UK Supreme Court.
Judges will hear the case later this year but the outcome is far from certain.
If the Scottish Government is defeated, Nicola Sturgeon has said the SNP will fight the next Westminster election on the sole issue of independence.
The First Minister has said that if pro-independence parties secure a majority of votes, this will amount to a mandate to end the Union.
READ MORE: GB News pundit 'bullied out of Conservative Party' amid 'KFC job jibes'
But 38% of those surveyed did not agree with this. The study found that 39% of those polled did agree that a majority of pro-indy votes would amount to a mandate.
Some 24% of those asked held no strong views or were undecided.
Meanwhile, economic arguments for independence appeared less convincing to voters.
Only 46% were convinced by the argument that Scotland’s economy would be “stronger outside the UK than within it” with 47% saying this was unconvincing.
It's the economy, stupid
Elsewhere in the study, arguments for remaining in the Union were tested, with economic considerations proving the strongest pull.
Some 57% of those asked said leaving the UK “would be a major risk for Scotland’s economy and jobs” was a convincing argument for staying in the Union, while 38% said it was an unconvincing argument.
And 56% said they found convincing the argument that “in spite of current challenges, the different countries of the UK still have more in common than divides us”, while 39% took the opposite view.
Scotland getting the “best of both worlds” from remaining part of the Union while enjoying control over some of its own affairs through devolution convinced 56%, with 41% rejecting this.
By any means?
The study also tested public confidence in the other ways in which Scotland could become independent, with 47% of voters saying a so-called wildcat referendum won by Yes and held without Westminster’s permission would establish a mandate for ending the Union.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she is 'British as well as Scottish'
A clear majority of 63% of those polled said a referendum won by Yes and held with Westminster’s permission would provide a mandate for independence – making this the most convincing option for most voters.
Rachel Ormston, research director at Ipsos in Scotland, said: “These findings highlight the challenges for pro-independence supporters in finding a mechanism to establish a democratic mandate for independence that is widely accepted by the Scottish public as a whole.
“While the UK Government appears unlikely to agree to a second referendum in the near future, this is currently the only route that a clear majority of Scots view as legitimate.
“This is in spite of the fact that one of the arguments in favour of independence that the Scottish public find most convincing is that Westminster cannot be trusted to act in Scotland’s best interests.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel