SIR Keir Starmer has insisted he is a “proud” trade unionist.
The Labour leader has come under pressure from some backbenchers over his position on frontbenchers on picket lines.
In July, he sacked shadow minister for busses and local transport Sam Tarry after the MP joined an RMT picket line.
READ MORE: ‘Scotland’s brand opens up doors across sectors’, business ambassador in America says
Other senior Labour figures, including shadow levelling up secretary Lisa Nandy and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, took to picket lines over the summer despite Starmer's ruling that frontbenchers should stay away.
And, during the Q&A on BBC Radio 5 Live, in an exchange over the energy crisis, one caller told Starmer: “The public is more left-wing than the Labour Party at the moment.”
Asked about the sacking of Tarry during the interview, Starmer said: “Nobody has been fired for going on a picket line.
“When it comes to those disputes, I completely understand why so many working people feel they need a wage increase.
“I completely understand what people are going through and I support the right to strike.”
Starmer said it is simply a “question of roles”.
“I want to be the Labour prime minister. I don’t think the role of the prime minister is (to) have a Cabinet meeting and then go on to a picket line.”
Labour previously said Tarry had been dismissed because he had broken the code of “collective responsibility” among the Labour frontbench, which requires senior MPs to have their media appearances approved by party high command.
Starmer then denied Labour’s energy policy amounts to “kicking the can down the road”, but acknowledged that something will have to be done early next year to tackle the crisis in the longer term.
READ MORE: SNP 'anticipating early General Election' as candidacy applications open
The Labour leader was quizzed on his plans to tackle soaring energy bills going beyond the middle of next year.
One listener told him: “The public is more left-wing than the Labour Party at the moment.”
Starmer said: “I don’t accept that is kicking the can down the road.”
He said his party’s plan is “meeting the concerns of millions of people”.
He said he understands the scale of the challenge facing households, adding that “many people listening and watching this will be saying ‘I can’t afford that'”.
Pressed on his longer-term plans, he pointed to his party’s call for a national mission on home insulation.
“On the question of what we do long term, I am completely up for that challenge,” he told the programme.
“I accept the challenge that something has got to be done in April.”
Of the Government, he said: “I don’t think we are approaching this in the right way, because we keep coming up with short-term answers.”
What is Labour's plan to deal with the energy crisis?
The party has pitched a six-month freeze on energy bills at the current £1971 price cap, funded in part by expanding the windfall tax on oil and gas profits.
Starmer also said during the policy launch that scrapping the planned increases in the price cap would keep inflation down, seeing it peak at about 9% rather than the 13% the Bank of England is forecasting.
The Labour leader also said in August that his party would not go ahead with the £400 rebate on energy bills that the Government has promised all households in October, saying: “We’re not going to let the price go up in the first place and so that’s how the £400 is catered for.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to chair emergency meeting over council strikes
“The bit we’re not cancelling is the £650 to pensioners and those on Universal Credit, so that is targeted support we would keep.”
Some experts and think tanks have warned that such a plan would prove inadequate to the scale of the cost-of-living crisis.
And, economists warned the plan could cost as much as the Covid furlough scheme if extended, while some on Labour’s left criticised Starmer rejection of calls for the nationalisation of energy firms in favour of handing them billions of pounds to make up for the difference between rising wholesale costs and what they charge customers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel