NICOLA Sturgeon has said the “broad shoulders” of the UK promised by Unionists are “nowhere to be seen” as the country faces a cost of living crisis – but that an independent Scotland could have already passed an emergency budget to take action on energy bills.
The First Minister pledged to make tackling the cost crisis “front and centre” of plans in the parliamentary year ahead, as she attacked the Westminster Government for “hibernating” over the summer.
Speaking ahead of the publication of the Scottish Government’s Programme for Government on Tuesday, she warned it was having to be produced amid an “unprecedented cloud of Westminster uncertainty”, with the new prime minister due to enter Downing Street on the same day.
But she said if Scotland was independent, an emergency budget on energy bills, VAT and on direct financial support could already have been passed.
READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: If Liz Truss can't ease this crisis, the Tories are screwed
“A decade of austerity, Brexit and brutal welfare cuts have contributed hugely to the current cost crisis,” she warned.
Sturgeon also pledged to work with the new prime minister, but hit out at the Tory candidates Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak for spending their campaigns focused on how to “put Scotland in its place”.
She said: “On Tuesday, the Scottish Government will publish its Programme for Government for the year ahead, and tackling the cost crisis will be front and centre of our plans.
“The steps we outline this week will build on the actions we have already taken with the limited powers of the Scottish Parliament to support household budgets, such as the Scottish Child Payment, the Carer’s Allowance Supplement and the Council Tax Reduction Scheme.
“However, the key levers in this crisis remain in the hands of the Tories at Westminster – a government which has been in hibernation over the summer as the Tory faithful choose who will be the fourth prime minister in six years. Their inaction has caused huge anxiety for families and huge uncertainty for businesses. It has been a dereliction of duty which people will neither forgive nor forget.
“At this most crucial of times, we are in the situation of announcing our plans for the year ahead in an unprecedented cloud of Westminster uncertainty. We don’t know if and when an emergency budget may happen, whether Scotland’s block grant is going to be cut this year, or what other measures they may introduce – all of which could fundamentally affect our plans.”
READ MORE: Despite Stephen Noon's devo-max push, Scotland is on a path to devolution minimus
DURING the Tory leadership campaign, frontrunner Truss sparked a furious backlash when she suggested she would “ignore” Sturgeon.
Both Tory candidates have ruled out agreeing to a second independence referendum.
Sturgeon said she would seek to “work constructively” with whoever becomes prime minister.
But she added: “Both candidates seem to have spent the campaign focused on how they can undermine the Scottish Parliament or put Scotland in its place, rather than engage with the legitimate aspirations of the people of Scotland.
“People in Scotland will be watching carefully [to see] how Westminster responds to the current emergency facing the UK.
“The ‘broad shoulders’ that we were told existed in 2014 are nowhere to be seen, and the promise of remaining in the EU and of lower energy bills were evidently not worth the paper they were written on. Instead, a decade of austerity, Brexit and brutal welfare cuts have contributed hugely to the current cost crisis.
“If Scotland was independent, we could have passed an emergency budget by now – taking action on energy bills, on VAT and on direct financial support as many other countries have done, to give much-needed assurance to households and businesses.
“Instead, we are left wrestling with meeting the challenges of fair pay, household hardship and rising costs for public services without the tools we need to tackle them.”
Sturgeon pledged that the new prospectus for independence – which is being rolled out in a series of papers – will show how a “wealthy, resource-rich Scotland could be wealthier, fairer and happier – much like our comparable European neighbours are – with the full powers of self-government”.
She added: “As we count the increasing cost of living with Westminster, more than ever Scotland needs to seize that opportunity with both hands.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel