WITH the death of the Queen, Prince Andrew's exile from the working monarchy looks certain to be permanent.
Charles is now the new King and any decision about Andrew, disgraced after paying out millions over a civil sexual assault case, will fall to him, no doubt in consultation with his eldest son and heir, the Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge.
Royal author Robert Jobson wrote that William had, unlike Charles, cut off all contact with his uncle.
“There will be no public role or comeback for York, if the Duke of Cambridge has any input on the matter – and let me assure you, he does,” a source told Jobson.
“He should be banished, as far as Prince William is concerned.”
READ MORE: Fresh pressure from Inverness politicians for Prince Andrew to lose Earl title
But Andrew’s place in the family remains as the royals grieve for their matriarch.
He rushed to his mother’s bedside at Balmoral on Thursday, joining Charles, the Princess Royal, the Earl and Countess of Wessex and Camilla, now Queen Consort.
Charles will have to decide whether to fund his brother’s lifestyle, as the Queen did.
Andrew is believed to have received an annual salary from the Queen’s £21 million a year private Duchy of Lancaster income.
The Duchy’s assets are held in trust for the sovereign, so are now under Charles’s control.
Questions will also be raised about Andrew’s home, Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park, which is a Crown Estate property, and also houses his ex-wife Sarah, Duchess of York.
The duke signed a 75-year lease on the mansion in 2003, but could potentially receive millions in compensation for refurbishment costs he carried out if he gives up the 31-bedroom home.
There are also likely to be further calls for Andrew to be stripped of his dukedom, severing his connection to the city of York. But peerages can only be removed by an act of parliament – although there are also limited circumstances in which hereditary peerages can be renounced by the holder.
Andrew also remains in the line of succession, and is still a Counsellor of State.
Andrew, grieving for his mother, will make an appearance at the Queen’s funeral, and is likely to process behind her coffin and join a vigil around it with his siblings while it lies in state.
READ MORE: When is the Queen’s funeral and will there be a bank holiday?
He is likely to want to pay a public on-camera tribute to the Queen, just as he did for his father, the Duke of Edinburgh.
But Charles and William are expected to want the aftermath of the Queen’s funeral to signal the end of Andrew’s public appearances.
The scenes in Westminster Abbey in March 2022 at Philip’s memorial service left commentators aghast at the duke’s prominent role after his public controversies.
As Andrew walked alongside his mother, the Queen held on to his elbow for support as she moved carefully and slowly to her seat.
Just weeks before, the duke had paid millions out of court to Virginia Giuffre, a woman he claimed had never met, who was suing him for allegedly sexually assaulting her when she was 17 and had been trafficked by billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Andrew had already stepped down from public duties after his disastrous Newsnight interview in 2019, in which he failed to show remorse for his friendship with Epstein and display any sympathy for the financier’s victims.
As Giuffre’s lawsuit gathered pace, the Queen finally moved, at the urging of William and Charles, to strip her second son in January 2022 of his honorary military titles and forbid him from using his birthright HRH style.
Andrew had been booted out of the monarchy.
But his key role at his father’s memorial service showed that at family occasions, even major televised ones, he was, as far as the Queen was concerned, welcome.
This was said to be met with dismay from Charles and William, and there was concern that Andrew was moving to wrangle a return to national life, particularly at the Platinum Jubilee celebrations.
He stayed behind closed doors for the Jubilee in the end, having contracted Covid.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel