UKRAINIANS in a newly freed village have spoken of life under months of Russian occupation.
Houses and shops in Hrakove, south-east of the country’s second-largest city Kharkiv, lie in ruins, while its school is a bombed-out shell and its church is scarred by rockets and artillery – though its golden dome still gleams in the fading autumn light.
Only around 30 people remain, living in basements and gutted buildings, according to resident Anatolii Klyzhen.
Around 1000 lived there when Russian troops rolled over the border in February, occupying the small village soon after. However, those forces abandoned Hrakove last week as Ukrainian soldiers advanced in a lightning counter-offensive.
That blitz could be a turning point, setting the stage for further gains in the east and elsewhere – but it could also trigger a violent response from Moscow, leading to a new and dangerous escalation in the war.
There were no signs the Russian soldiers were about to leave.
“Nobody knew anything. They left very quietly,” said Viacheslav Myronenko, 71, who has lived in the basement of his bombed-out apartment building with three neighbours for more than four months.
The detritus of a fleeing army still litters the village: packs of empty Russian army food rations, abandoned crates with instructions for using grenades, a gas mask dangling on a tree and an army jacket trampled into the mud.
Just outside the village by the bus stop, a Russian tank lies rusting on a road pockmarked with craters from shells, with its turret and cannon blown off its body.
Feral dogs roam the mud-rutted streets and authorities warn of mines and booby-traps in the weeds.
“Before, the village looked really beautiful,” said Klyzhen, who spent 45 days living in his building’s basement while Russian soldiers occupied his now-wrecked apartment on the second floor.
Klyzhen eventually managed to flee, deciding to take his chances at checkpoints.
The Russian soldiers were frightened and paranoid, he said, and would check residents’ mobile phones for anything anti-Russian or that they thought might give away their positions.
Some people were taken away and he never saw them again.
“I figured I could die at home or die at the checkpoint,” the 45-year-old said on Tuesday.
But he made it through, and returned after Hrakove was retaken to see what remains of his home.
He found the windows blasted out and Russian army food packets, clothes and boxes strewn around.
In one room lay a pile of TVs that he thinks soldiers may have stolen.
After retaking the village, Ukrainian authorities removed abandoned Russian military vehicles and exhumed the bodies of two men who had been buried by the side of a road after being shot in the head, Klyzhen said. He thinks they were Ukrainian soldiers but he is not sure.
“They were killing locals, shooting them,” he said. “There was nothing good in here.”
A few weeks into the Russian occupation in Hrakove, Myronenko and his neighbours banded together to clear rubbish out of the basement of their apartment building and turn it into a shelter.
With their apartments destroyed, it remains their home.
They ventured outside to plant potatoes despite the incessant shelling, knowing they needed food to survive.
“Of course it was scary, it is very scary for everyone, when everything is shaking in here,” said one of them, 70-year-old Oleh Lutsai.
Leaving was not an option for him.
“I’m 70 years old, I was born here,” he said. “So why should I run away from here?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here