A LEADING trade union has written to the head of staff at King Charles’s former household urging him to stop planned job cuts at Clarence House.
The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), the UK’s sixth largest union, has written to the King's Principal Private Secretary Sir Clive Alderton asking him to stop the proposed redundancies and meet with the union ahead of any future consultation.
It was reported earlier this week that some staff at Clarence House had been warned their jobs were at risk following Charles’s accession to the throne.
The union has said that up to 100 employees received a notification they could be made redundant.
READ MORE: King Charles's staff at Clarence House sacked during St Giles' Cathedral service
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: “To issue a notice of redundancy during the period of mourning is shocking and insensitive.
“We call on Sir Clive to think again, to withdraw his letter and engage with us on any future staffing plans.”
The Guardian first reported that staff were told the news during the thanksgiving service for the Queen which took place in Edinburgh on Monday.
The newspaper revealed a letter from Alderton which highlighted plans for redundancies. It read: “The change in role for our principals will also mean change for our household.
“The portfolio of work previously undertaken in this household supporting the former Prince of Wales’s personal interests, former activities and household operations will no longer be carried out, and the household… at Clarence House will be closed down.
READ MORE: Anger over Prince Andrew's Earl of Inverness title amid Counsellor of State backlash
“It is therefore expected that the need for the posts principally based at Clarence House, whose work supports these areas will no longer be needed.
“I appreciate that this is unsettling news and I wanted to let you know of the support that is available at this point.”
Alderton added that certain staff providing “direct, close, personal support and advice” to the new King and the Queen Consort would remain.
It is believed that legal advice taken by the household required the information to be shared with staff at the earliest opportunity.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel