THE father of a murdered teenager has said his family will be “absolutely delighted” if Scotland’s controversial not proven verdict is scrapped.
Joe Duffy has been campaigning for the abolition of the third verdict, which is unique to Scotland, since the trial of the man accused of killing his daughter.
Frances Auld was acquitted of murdering 19-year-old student Amanda Duffy after her body was found on waste ground in Hamilton in 1992, with a jury returning a verdict of not proven against him.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has now announced plans to abolish the verdict, which are set to be included in a forthcoming Criminal Justice Bill.
The father said that having the third option available to juries was “unnecessary and outmoded” and that its abolition was “long overdue”.
READ MORE: Helicopter hits electricity pylon during search for minerals in Aberdeenshire
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, he added: “Hopefully this Bill will get passed and we will be, as a family, absolutely delighted.”
While the the Law Society of Scotland has said it is “deeply concerned” about the change, Duffy said: “I don’t see how it gives additional protection.
“If there’s insufficient evidence or the evidence isn’t good enough you are actually entitled to a not guilty verdict, surely.
“Guilty and not guilty works in every country in the world. The only place that is unique is Scotland.”
He said there was no other “country in the world that has three verdicts, especially when you consider two of them being exactly the same thing”.
The First Minister has said that if legislation to abolish the not proven verdict is passed it “will be a change of truly historic significance in Scotland, and one firmly intended to improve access to justice for victims of crime”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel