UNIONIST attempts to politicise the Queen’s death were “deeply disappointing and disrespectful”, it has been claimed.
Figures within the SNP have hit out at media coverage of the Queen’s death and the events following which they say have exposed “rampant hypocrisy” within the Unionist camp.
The sovereign’s death nominally put politics on hold for more than a week as almost all political campaigning and activities were officially paused as a mark of respect.
But reports quoting figures “close to” senior Unionist figures such as Scottish Secretary Alister Jack and former prime minister Gordon Brown said they were furious at the BBC for veteran correspondent Alan Little pointing out King Charles took over a nation divided by the constitutional question in one of his reports on the Queen’s funeral.
READ MORE: Mystery behind creepy ITV clip of Queen's funeral coverage is solved
One SNP figure asked whether Jack would be similarly furious about a comment piece by Scotland Office official Tom Harris in the Daily Mail last week, in which the former Labour MP claimed the Queen’s death was “a setback” for the party.
They also queried what Brown’s reaction was to comments made by Labour peer Lord Robertson on Newsnight on September 12, in which he said the new King was determined to see the independence movement fail.
Another SNP source said: “The passing of Her Majesty the Queen has been a profound and historic moment for people across our country and around the world. The politicisation around events over the past 10 days is quite frankly hypocritical, deeply disappointing and disrespectful, and people will have seen that for themselves."
READ MORE: Gordon Brown launches new advisory board for his Unionist think tank – here's who's in
It comes after the BBC was criticised for their wall-to-wall coverage of the pomp and ceremony following the Queen’s death.
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie called for “space” to debate the monarchy following the accession of Charles to the throne and said it should not be the case that republicans are unable to make their views heard even during a sensitive time.
The Scotland Office declined to comment.
Brown’s Unionist think tank Our Scottish Future was also approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel