NEW data has shown the total costs of cycling accidents for Edinburgh City Council since the city’s tram tracks were built.
More than £1.2 million has been paid out to cyclists who have fallen off their bike on the tram lines over the last decade.
A freedom of information request found that 196 claims have been successfully made by cyclists who have sustained injuries or damage to their bike after slipping on tracks or getting wheels stuck.
Since 2012, £1,262,141, has been paid out by the council. The administration stressed that work is ongoing along the network to enhance safety for cyclists.
READ MORE: Alcohol’s link to cancer highlighted in updated guidance for healthcare workers
In total, there have been 442 accidents involving cyclists on tram lines, with the vast majority occurring along Princes Street and around Haymarket.
Green councillor Claire Miller said the figures are “just the tip of the iceberg as many people don’t contact the council when they are injured".
She added: “It’s outrageous that the council knows the tram line is dangerous for people on bikes, but it is paying out injury claims instead of making it safe.
“Unless the council truly prioritises road safety, and invests it in making safe spaces for cycling, hundreds more people will be hurt.
“The Trams To Newhaven project is building miles of track on our roads so I’m going to raise this FOI and find out what is being done to ensure a far better safety record in future.”
Professor Chris Oliver from Spokes Lothian Cycle Campaign said: “I’m not unsurprised that trams system related cycling injuries continue.
“Spokes – The Lothian Cycling Campaign originally advised prior to the construction of the Edinburgh tram line that the infrastructure should be protected and that cyclists should not be freely mixed with trams. An expert even came over to advise but the advice was not heeded.
“There have been some recent improvements but these have come slowly and too late. I’m sure there will be continual waves of litigation from injured cyclists, some of whom will be permanently injured and have reduced capacity to work.”
Edinburgh’s transport convener Scott Arthur said: “It is important to note that some of these claims pre-date the opening of the line and the many safety improvements made since then.
“Nonetheless, the number of claims submitted is concerning to me. I am committed to ensuring the safety of all road users, and I know that over the last five years the Council has been working on a phased package of improvements to cycle safety along the tram route.”
Safety changes made over the years include new red-surfaced cycle lanes at key points along the tram route "to direct cyclists on the safest route to cross the tram tracks to avoid getting their wheels stuck".
READ MORE: SNP accuse Unionists of 'rampant hypocrisy' over 'politicising Queen's death'
Cllr Arthur added: “The council is now in the process of completing phase three of the project, which includes significant changes to the road layouts at six junctions to give greater priority to people on bikes.
“This is in addition to previous measures like enhanced road markings and the installation of cycle early release signals at 13 junctions along the route. The west end junction on Princes Street is a key focus too, and its remodelling will be a key part of the transformation of the Lothian Road corridor.
“I have just written to Sustrans requesting funding for design work which will result in the transformation of this key route into the city centre.
“The council’s commitment to cycle safety has been central to Trams to Newhaven which has drawn from lessons learnt in the first project. As well as a dedicated cycle lane down Leith Walk, the scheme is delivering improvements for pedestrians and cyclists along the whole route.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel