THERE has been an endless succession of polls asking how people would vote in an independence referendum.
But the Scottish Social Attitudes survey findings are particularly significant because it is part of a study which aims to identify what’s happening in the long term.
The National Centre for Social Research uses the “gold standard” of random probability sampling – which it says ensures everyone has an equal chance of being picked to take part and ensure the results are representative of the British population.
Many of the same questions are repeated over time – enabling researchers to “identify real changes in people’s social attitudes”.
When it comes to the issue of what people think of how Scotland should be governed, there are three options for the answer – independence, devolution and having no parliament at all.
Up until the independence referendum of 2014, support for independence hovered around at around a third, reaching a peak of 35% in 2005.
But the numbers have been creeping steadily upwards since then – from 33% in 2014 to 52% now, with a slight dip only recorded in 2017.
Today’s report emphasises that Scotland is not alone, with the constitutional debate also becoming more polarised in Northern Ireland.
What it shows is that the UK has left the EU – but the story of Brexit and whether the Union can survive it is far from over.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel