NEW A&E waiting times figures have been released which show that, in the week ending 11th of September, only 63.5% of patients were dealt with within four hours.
The Health Secretary said the figures were "not acceptable" and pledged to improve performance.
Unsurprisingly, both Anas Sarwar and Douglas Ross raised the issue during FMQs on Thursday.
Douglas Ross kicked things off by asking what action Nicola Sturgeon was taking now to reduce waiting times.
READ MORE: Scotland's A&E waiting times better than rest of UK, Nicola Sturgeon stresses
She said that the most recent performance figures were "not good enough" and reflected the significant pressure felt across health and social caring arising from the pandemic.
She then deployed a politician’s favourite weapon: the stats bomb. The First Minister reeled off a series of big numbers: of all the NHS staff that have been recruited and all the cash that has been spent and what percentage of hip operations she has personally carried out.
Douglas Ross might have been secretly impressed, if she hadn’t ruined it all by mentioning that which should never be mentioned.
Yes, she went there. She spoke about other parts of the UK were performing.
She said she was only doing so to give "context" but the damage was already done and the vein in Douglas Ross’s forehead was already beginning to throb.
"Our accident and emergency departments are performing better than those in England, Wales and Northern Ireland" she said.
"If we look at the last complete month where we have figures, performance against the four-hour target in Scotland was 66.5%, compared to 57% in England, 55.2% in Wales and 45.7% in Northern Ireland.
"Context may be important to the First Minister and her members behind her, but for people waiting hours and days for A&E treatment, they are hollow words" replied Douglas Ross.
He then went on to talk about a patient in Ayrshire who had to wait 84 hours for treatment.
Nicola Sturgeon said it was an "unacceptable situation" and she would look into the detail of the case.
She then went on to say that – in relation to the four-hour target – Scotland’s performance wasn’t good enough but it was still better than the rest of the UK.
Douglas Ross then did a remarkable impression of my eight-year-old by showing that he had only listened to a few seconds of her reply while zoning out the rest of it.
I say to my wee girl: "Once you’ve tidied away your toys and put your washing in the basket, then you can go and get a packet of crisps."
But what she hears is: "get a packet of crisps."
Confident that he’d got the jist of what she was saying without actually listening to her answer, Douglas Ross jumped to his feet and proclaimed: "Unbelievably, the First Minister just said there that 84 hours is not good enough, but it’s better than other parts of the United Kingdom!
Top tip, if you are describing something as "unbelievable" you might want to double check whether or not it actually happened.
The First Minister was keen to correct the record.
"It doesn’t do anybody any service at all to deliberately twist and misrepresent what I said in my previous answer" she said.
Which is exactly what I’ll be telling my daughter the next time she smuggles a packet of Wotsits out of the kitchen before doing her chores.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel