THE Scottish Government has a “fundamental opposition” to a UK-wide bill that would spell the end of EU laws in the UK.
The Retained EU Law (Reform and Revocation) Bill was introduced by the UK Government on Thursday, and would pass into law a sunset clause for the majority of European law that would take effect from the end of 2023.
But a letter from Scotland’s Constitution Secretary to senior Tory minister Jacob Rees-Mogg said the bill would result in a “race to the bottom” by scrapping EU regulations.
“I am writing to express again my deep concern and the fundamental opposition of Scottish Ministers to the Retained EU Law (Reform and Revocation) Bill, introduced today by the UK Government,” wrote Angus Robertson.
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg supports 'outrageous' claim that Vladimir Putin funded fracking opponents
“This bill puts at risk the high standards people in Scotland have rightly come to expect from EU membership. You appear to want to row back 47 years of protections in a rush to impose a deregulated, race to the bottom, society and economy.
“This is clearly at odds with the wishes of the vast majority of the people of Scotland who will be dismayed at the direction the UK Government is taking.”
Robertson said he had expressed concerns earlier this month about the bill, claiming that “Brexit ideology, rather than the best interests of our citizens and businesses” would be put first.
“Now that we have received the full print of the bill (disappointingly with less than a day’s notice), it is alarming to see this concern realised,” he added.
The Constitution Secretary also claimed the process around the bill undermined devolution, because he has not received a request for legislative consent.
There is currently no legal requirement for Westminster to ask for consent from devolved parliaments when legislating in devolved areas, but a convention means ministers are expected to ask for legislative consent.
“I am greatly concerned by the attitude of the UK Government in respect of devolved power, including the operation of the Sewel Convention with regards to this legislation – despite your assurances when we met in May that the Convention would be respected,” he wrote.
“At the time of writing, I have received no legislative consent request from you in relation to the bill.
“As a matter of urgency, could you please clarify that you will be seeking this from the Scottish Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel