THE Tories have been accused of another power-grab and "riding roughshod" through the devolution settlement following the publication of the UK Government's so-called "Brexit Freedoms" bill.
The Retained EU Law (Reform and Revocation) Bill aims to repeal all EU regulations in the UK, including those protecting safe limits on working hours and parental leave, and standards on water quality and baby food.
The UK Government wants to do this by December 31, 2023, which the SNP say risks a vital law that protects many rights and standards disappearing overnight.
It also gives the Scottish Parliament just one year to legislate to protect 47 years' worth of EU regulations, and the bill will allow UK Government ministers to act in policy areas that are devolved without the consent of the Scottish Government, directly contradicting devolution and the Sewel Convention.
Food Standards Scotland (FSS) has additionally warned the bill in its current form poses a "significant risk" to food safety and standards, as it would result in the removal of consumer protections relating to food that have existed in Scotland and the rest of the UK for “many years”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rips into Tories' mini-budget: 'Super wealthy laughing all the way to the bank'
Currently, retained EU law requires businesses to provide clear information on their food, as well as labels for allergens.
The SNP’s Cabinet Office spokesperson, Brendan O’Hara, said the bill "rides roughshod" over the devolution settlement.
He said: “Just like the Tories’ Internal Market Bill, the ‘Brexit Freedoms’ Bill is another attempt at a power-grab on Scotland and threatens vital protections, yet Liz Truss and her Cabinet are determined to push it through anyway.
“With the UK Government imposing such a reckless deadline, there is a real risk that laws protecting rights and standards - such as holiday pay, parental leave, and the 48-hour work week, as well as good air and water quality - could simply drop off the statute books overnight.
“It also rides roughshod over the devolution settlement, by giving UK ministers the power to act within devolved areas without consent from the Scottish Government.
“Not only has the Tories’ hard Brexit taken a sledgehammer to our economy and living standards, but the Westminster government has attempted to use it on multiple occasions now to undermine the Scottish Government and democracy, making clear that their 'union of equals' rhetoric is utterly hollow.
READ MORE: The key points from Kwasi Kwarteng's mini-budget announcement
“Scotland, and our government, has for too long been using time, money and energy to undo or mitigate damaging policies implemented by a Westminster government we didn’t vote for. It’s clear that Scotland must escape the broken Westminster system and gain the full powers of independence.”
The Sewel Convention applies when the UK Parliament wants to legislate on a matter within the devolved competence of the Scottish Parliament, National Assembly for Wales or Northern Ireland Assembly. Under the terms of the convention, the UK Parliament will “not normally” do so without the relevant devolved institution having passed a legislative consent motion.
In a letter to senior Tory minister Jacob Rees-Mogg, Scotland's Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson said the bill would result in a “race to the bottom” by scrapping EU regulations.
His letter said: "This bill puts at risk the high standards people in Scotland have rightly come to expect from EU membership. You appear to want to row back 47 years of protections in a rush to impose a deregulated, race-to-the-bottom, society and economy."
He added: "At the time of writing, I have received no legislative consent request from you in relation to the bill."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel