QUESTION Time still has “some way to go” before it can be considered fair and balanced, the SNP have said, following apparent attempts by presenter Fiona Bruce to address accusations the show has a right-wing bias.
Bruce began Thursday night’s show – coming from Grimsby - with a statement highlighting how it was “absolutely critical” to have “a fair range of views” on the programme, both in the audience and on the panel.
She also made a point early on of mentioning which party each audience member she was speaking to had voted for, with Tory, LibDem and Labour all represented.
At the start of Thursday’s show, Bruce said: “As always, having a fair range of views on this programme is absolutely critical, not only on our panel but with our studio audience as well.
"And you know sitting there you’ve been selected mainly to represent the voting back at the last election of the particular nation we are in, so in England, but also we keep in mind local election results and any sustained change in polling as well.”
In July, it emerged the BBC had seen the highest number of complaints this year so far for a single issue after hundreds raised concerns of “pro-Conservative bias” on Question Time.
The 708 complaints focused on a broadcast on June 23 which featured RMT union boss Mick Lynch. They raised concerns of “bias against Mick Lynch / Bias in favour of the Conservative Party” during the show.
READ MORE: EU law bill represents another power-grab by UK Government, say SNP
Question Time has also faced repeated calls to explain its audience and panel selection process fully, after some people were able to appear on the show multiple times in recent years.
The SNP said Bruce’s statement on Thursday was “noteworthy” but insisted the panel was still imbalanced, consisting of Tory minister Brendan Clarke-Smith, Boris Johnson’s economic adviser Gerard Lyons and unelected Brexit Party lord Claire Fox.
Labour shadow health secretary Wes Streeting and LibDem foreign affairs spokesperson Layla Moran were also on the panel.
An SNP source said: “BBC Question Time has some way to go before audiences north of the Border consider it fair and balanced.
“With a Tory Minister, a Tory Prime Minister’s economic adviser and a Brexit Party Tory Lord this was a classic right-wing BBC Question Time panel.
“However, Fiona Bruce’s commitment that the BBCQT audience is selected ‘mainly to represent the nation they are in’ is noteworthy and we look forward to that being consistent when the programme comes to Scotland.”
A Green councillor for Lancaster City Council also pointed out the party had not been represented on the show for nearly a year, while Streeting had been on the panel several times since then.
Just your regular reminder that the Greens haven’t appeared on BBC Question Time since last November. Wes Streeting alone has been on four times since then.
— Cllr Jack Lenox 🌍 (@GreenPartyJack) September 22, 2022
But yes, let’s hear more from unelected Claire Fox, who doesn’t represent anyone but herself, and is never off the Beeb.
Cllr Jack Lenox said on Twitter: “Just your regular reminder that the Greens haven’t appeared on BBC Question Time since last November. Wes Streeting alone has been on four times since then.
“But yes, let’s hear more from unelected Claire Fox, who doesn’t represent anyone but herself, and is never off the Beeb.”
The episode featuring Lynch attracted a formal complaint after Bruce was slated for intervening on behalf of a Tory MP to criticise the trade unionist. It was eventually dismissed.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rips into Tories' mini-budget: 'Super wealthy laughing all the way to the bank'
And it is not the only example of the show having got itself into bother over balance in recent times.
In a May episode, the panel was made up of five guests with only two representing the left of the political spectrum. One of the guests, Lucy Frazer MP, once made headlines after making a joke about sending Scots to the “colonies” as slaves.
And last year, Bruce told audience members in Hampshire they had been “carefully” chosen to ensure they were pro-Brexit.
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel