TORY plans to further punish people on benefits by threatening them with sanctions if they do not meet tough new rules are unfair and “backwards”, critics have said.
Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announced the changes during his mini-budget on Friday morning and pledged to take punitive action on the working poor who top up their earnings with Universal Credit.
The Government’s “growth plan” threatens to subject more people than ever to intensive work coaching, with thousands of people who work and receive benefits set to be taken out of the light touch regime.
The light touch regime for higher earners receiving Universal Credit meant they did not need to attend work coach sessions or a Jobcentre to find better-paid work with the accompanying risk of being sanctioned by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for failing to comply.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rips into Tories' £45bn tax-cutting plan with scathing verdict
SNP benefits spokesperson Kirsty Blackman said instead of helping the worst-off, the Government was “threatening to cut their family budgets further, with a new regime of benefit sanctions”.
She added: “The SNP have repeatedly urged the DWP to increase Universal Credit, axe the two-child cap, benefit cap, and bedroom tax, as well as scrap the five-week wait and turn the advance payment loan into a non-repayable grant once a person is deemed eligible for support.
“UK ministers have time and again refused to heed our calls.
"With independence, we can escape the broken Westminster system and their backwards thinking, as well as Tory governments we don't vote for, and progress further and faster on creating a fairer society in Scotland - where the rich aren't made richer on the backs of the poor."
How will the changes affect UC claimants?
Prior to the changes, people who worked and earned less than £114 per week were required to attend weekly or fortnightly work coaching sessions aimed at helping them find better-paid work.
The new regime means anyone on less than £142.50 a week – some 120,000 people, according to the Government’s estimates – will need to attend these sessions or face having their benefits cut.
READ MORE: Question Time attempts to address bias criticism - but is warned it's not enough
Responding to the announcement in the Commons, Hilary Benn, the Labour MP for Leeds Central, demanded to know “how on earth” the plans were fair when contrasted with plans to allow bankers once again to have uncapped bonuses.
He added: “The Chancellor argues on the one hand, that those on the lowest incomes – people on Universal Credit – should face the threat of having their income reduced further, in order to boost economic growth.
“While on the other hand, he says to people already on the highest income – bankers – that they need an increase in their incomes through their bonuses in order to do the same.”
The Treasury said the measures will help more people find more work and better-paid employment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel