A LABOUR MP has been administratively suspended from the party pending an investigation after she described Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng as "superficially black".
Rupa Huq, MP for Ealing Central and Acton, made the remarks about Kwarteng at a Labour conference fringe event on Monday entitled "What's Next for Labour's Agenda on Race?"
In audio published online, Huq can be heard discussing his elite school background, before adding that “you wouldn’t know he is black” when listening to him on the radio.
Earlier this month, Kwarteng became Britain’s first black Chancellor.
Huq has now offered her "sincere and heartfelt apologies" to Kwarteng for her "ill-judged" comments.
Tory party chair Jake Berry raised “serious concerns” in a letter to Starmer, with the audio being published by the Guido Fawkes website shortly before his conference speech.
Keir Starmer must act over Rupa Huq’s digusting comments at #LPC22 about the Chancellor.
— Jake Berry MP (@JakeBerry) September 27, 2022
“Superficially he is a black man” because he’s Conservative is a vile thing to say. pic.twitter.com/DtVwYSNN6N
“I trust you will join me in unequivocally condemning these comments as nothing less than racist and that the Labour whip be withdrawn from Rupa Huq as a consequence,” he wrote.
Huq was said to be sitting next to Labour chair Anneliese Dodds when she made the remarks.
In the audio, Huq could be heard saying: “Superficially he is a black man.
“He went to Eton, I think, he went to a very expensive prep school, all the way through, the top schools in the country.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar: Labour 'in the game' for 14 Scottish seats at Westminster
“If you hear him on the Today programme, you wouldn’t know he is black.”
Berry said that Sunder Katwala, who was chairing the event for the British Future and Black Equity organisations, was forced to challenge her remarks.
According to the Tory MP, Katwala said that the Chancellor’s Conservative views “doesn’t make him not black … and I think the Labour Party has to be really careful”.
Huq and the Labour Party have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel