KING Charles has been allowed to vet emergency legislation to freeze rents in Scotland because it could affect tenants on the Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire.
A bill to stop landlords raising rent prices for the next six months is making its way through Holyrood this week.
It comes after rules were changed at Holyrood last year following a Guardian investigation into the monarch's power to influence UK laws, under rules known in Scotland as Crown Consent.
The paper revealed last year that ministers in Edinburgh had allowed Queen Elizabeth to vet at least 67 pieces of legislation that affected her personal property and public powers. A Scottish government memo revealed it was “almost certain” proposed laws had been secretly changed to secure the Queen’s approval.
In response to criticism of the mechanism, Holyrood’s presiding officer Alison Johnstone told the Scottish Government it now had to tell Parliament as soon as a new bill was tabled whether the monarch had been allowed to see it first.
Previously, ministers would only tell MSPs at the final stages of a bill’s scrutiny that the monarch had been allowed to secretly vet it.
The Cost of Living (Protection of Tenants) (Scotland) Bill - which was published on Monday - is the first piece of legislation to be affected by Johnstone's ruling and the first to be vetted by the King.
A motion to treat the bill as emergency legislation was passed by 86 votes to 28 on Tuesday afternoon.
The Scottish Tories voiced their opposition to the move, citing a lack of time for MSPs to properly understand the bill.
Nicola Sturgeon announced in the Programme for Government last month that rents in the private and social rental sector would be frozen, with legislation being introduced to backdate the freeze to September 6.
In an announcement a few hours before the bill was published, Minister for Parliamentary Business George Adam said ministers would explain how a bill applied to the royal family's personal and official interests and why crown consent was needed.
The Government has not said whether any changes were made to the bill at the King's request, which attracted criticism from the Scottish LibDems who said the measures "barely scratch the surface".
Alex Cole-Hamilton, the Scottish LibDem leader, said: “The Scottish Government should instead list any changes made to legislation at the request of the King’s lawyers when it arrives at and goes through Parliament.
"Everyone deserves to know how their laws are being made."
A policy memorandum published with the draft bill says: “Crown Consent will be required because it is considered that the provisions in the bill affecting private residential tenancies could affect residential tenancies on His Majesty’s private estates and those on land forming part of the Scottish Crown Estate.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said if they won power at Holyrood he would introduce laws requiring ministers to publish correspondence on the king’s lobbying.
He said: “I think people would expect any democratic system, a system designed for the people and in a representative parliamentary democracy, for these issues all to be out in the open for people to know how decisions are made, why decisions are made and where suggested amendments have come from."
How has the housing crisis affected you?
Are you struggling to buy your first home? Are you paying extortionate rent? Has your landlord hiked it amid a cost of living crisis? Scotland is going through a housing crisis. House prices continue to spiral and experts struggle to see an end in sight. If you have been affected by the housing situation in Scotland, The National wants to hear your story. We want to explain Scotland's housing crisis through the eyes of those experiencing it first-hand.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel