SHADOW Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been heavily criticised for her response to a question about Suella Braverman's asylum policy plans.
This comes as it was revealed that the Home Secretary plans to ban anyone who enters Britain illegally from claiming asylum.
Braverman also told the Tory Party conference that it would be her “dream” to see an image of a plane taking asylum seekers to Rwanda on the front of the Daily Telegraph.
Braverman’s plans have led to widespread condemnation and there have been warnings that the UK Government risks “breaking international law”.
But when asked about the plans on Sky News, Reeves instead appeared concerned that the Government is not doing enough deporting already.
She said: “The Conservatives have been in government for 12 years now and illegal immigration is on the increase so this is a problem that’s been made under their watch.
'This is a problem made under their watch'
— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 4, 2022
Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves MP says that illegal immigration has been on the increase whilst Conservatives have been in government and calls the lack of deportations "12 years of Tory failure"
👉 https://t.co/xZtjki2Yiq
📺 Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/O6urjKZlqU
“They need to process claims faster, get people out of the country if they’ve got no right to be here and get a grip of their failed immigration system which is not working for British people and it’s not working for genuine asylum seekers either.”
Reeves was also asked if she welcomed Braverman’s plans to introduce legislation to make it easier to deport people.
She said: “Well the problem is the Government are not deporting people today even when their claims have failed.
READ MORE: Research finds 'incompetent' is the word most associated with Liz Truss by public
“What the Government need to do is get a grip of the system, process claims quicker, ensure that people have not got a right to be here are sent home, but that’s not happening today and that is 12 years of Tory failure.’
The shadow chancellor’s answers have led to widespread criticism on social media.
SNP MP John Nicolson said on Twitter: “‘The problem is the government are not deporting people’. So depressing to hear this from Labour.
“The party still doesn’t seem to understand that you can’t appease racism.
“Labour should be standing up for those seeking sanctuary on our shores, not dog whistling for the tabloids.”
“The problem is the government are not deporting people". So depressing to hear this from Labour. The party still doesn’t seem to understand that you can’t appease racism. Labour should be standing up for those seeking sanctuary on our shores, not dog whistling for the tabloids. https://t.co/zdatBsIGdk
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) October 5, 2022
Professor Tanja Bueltmann said: “This is disturbing and wrong. But not surprising: ultimately, Labour supports the hostile environment and always has. That position is one reason why I support Scottish independence: within the Union, we will not be able to end the hostile environment.”
Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker also posted on social media, saying: “Crikey: they’re trying to outdo each other’s awfulness now.”
Another user suggested “you’d make a very good Tory Home Secretary” whilst another said they were “appalled” to see a Labour politician speaking in this manner.
Journalist Owen Jones also re-tweeted the post and said: “Labour are going to win the next election by default, and then we are going to fight them when they do some terrible things.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel