A TORY MSP has claimed Nicola Sturgeon saying she "detested" the Tories bordered on a hate crime.
Jeremy Balfour made the accusation on the BBC's Debate Night during a discussion about whether the language the First Minister used over the weekend was appropriate.
The SNP leader said in an interview: “I detest the Tories. If the question to me is would I prefer a Labour government over a Tory government – I detest the Tories and everything they stand for – so it’s not difficult to answer that question.”
Balfour referred to the Scottish Government's Hate Crime Bill - which was passed last year - and said Sturgeon had got "pretty close" to breaking the legislation.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at any price you can afford
He said: "We have an absolute right to criticise any policy brought forward by any government and you can tell us and tell everyone how that has affected you either positively or negatively.
"Where I think we have to draw a line is when we start attacking individuals, because we have seen in this country in very recent times politicians being attacked, politicians being killed, because they’ve been [part of] a certain political party.
“We’ve passed legislation…around hate crime. I think the first minister got pretty close to actually breaking that legislation”
— BBC Debate Night (@bbcdebatenight) October 12, 2022
@JeremyFBalfour says words can incite hatred and violence, “and none of us want to see that in modern day Scottish politics” #bbcdn pic.twitter.com/E01nomFbiW
"We’ve passed legislation – I don’t think it’s particularly good legislation – about hate crime. I think the First Minister got pretty close to breaking that legislation [with her comments about detecting Tories]."
The Hate Crime Bill - passed last March - updated the list of characteristics protected under hate crime legislation which now includes age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity, and variations in sex characteristics, as well as the 'stirring up' of hatred offences.
Sturgeon said her comments referred to Tory policies and values rather than individuals and insisted she did not regret what she said.
READ MORE: Dig into the details and it’s clear that Liz Truss is stuck in a lose-lose position
An audience member said she was confused about what language was appropriate to describe a party that had caused "great harm" to the country.
‘What would you say is the appropriate language for a political party that’s caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people?’ This lady captures the righteous anger Scotland feels right now. Superb. #bbcdn pic.twitter.com/5m8I819byw
— Phantom Power (@PhantomPower14) October 12, 2022
She said: "What would you say the appropriate language is to use when referring to a political party that has caused great harm to this country? Not only economically but also about 250,000 deaths during the Covid pandemic by the horrendous public policies and their horrendous protection of the NHS staff.
"I don’t know how you appropriately say how horrendous the Tory party behaviour [is] and what they have done to the people of this country.
"Twenty-thousand people have died through austerity measures due to Tories, so how do I express how unhappy I am with what you have done to my personal bank account and to the people in this country?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel