FORMER home secretary Priti Patel is reportedly being tipped for a seat in the House of Lords.
Patel has come up in formal talks around Boris Johnson's resignation honours list - according to openDemocracy - which is different to the already-leaked political honours list he is expected to nominate.
The Daily Telegraph reported the names of 25 people expected to become peers - which includes former Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre and Nicholas Soames - but that list was apparently created long before Johnson left Downing Street.
He has now reportedly submitted his own new list after resigning which includes Patel.
Just hours after Liz Truss won the leadership race, Patel - who brought about the controversial plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda - resigned as home secretary as it became widely rumoured Suella Braverman would get the job.
Outgoing prime ministers are usually granted a resignation honours list to reward their allies and these often include donors.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon's 'detest Tories' comment borders on hate crime, says Tory MSP
David Cameron’s 2016 resignation honours included a peerage for major Tory donor Andrew Fraser while Theresa May's featured David Brownlow, who went on to be at the centre of Johnson’s “wallpapergate” scandal.
A leaked memo earlier this year, from the company of longtime Johnson ally Lynton Crosby, suggested there were plans to pack the House of Lords with at least 40 new Tory peers, giving the party a majority in the upper chamber.
Johnson made more than 80 nominations to the House of Lords in just under three years as prime minister including billionaire party donor Peter Cruddas, which was made in defiance of advice from the independent watchdog for appointments to the Lords.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at any price you can afford
The House of Lords Appointments Commission raised concerns over his nomination in December 2020, over allegations of a cash-for-access scandal in 2012, which prompted the then Tory party co-treasurer to resign.
He also nominated Russian-born billionaire Evgeny Lebedev and his younger brother Jo Johnson, who now sits as Lord Johnson of Marylebone.
It was revealed earlier today the head of the House of Lords Appointment Commission has written to Liz Truss and Keir Starmer to tell them their recent nominees to the House of Lords have put the committee in an ‘uncomfortable position’, urging the leaders to improve the calibre of new appointments.
The House of Lords, consisting of around 800 unelected members, is the second largest legislature in the world behind the National People’s Congress of China.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said: "The Conservative Party has shown time and again their utter contempt for the democratic institutions of this country, so it’s little surprise they’re continuing to stuff the already bloated House of Lords to the brim with their colleagues and rich friends. Westminster will always be rife with cronyism.
"At Westminster, they can debate the ‘calibre’ of Lords' nominees until the cows come home but we know that no matter the calibre or quality of a potential Lord their entry into the chamber is undemocratic so long as it remains an unelected institution."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel