EUROPEAN independence movements are closely watching developments in Scotland’s battle to leave Westminster behind.
Observers from the Basque Country, in the north of Spain, and Catalonia, in the east of the country, have said they followed closely the Supreme Court case last week, with one member of the European Parliament describing it as an “example” for others.
Jordi Sole, an MEP for the Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (the Republican Left of Catalonia), said he and fellow Catalan independence supporters had been following the case.
He said: “The countries are different and the situations are different but we have always regarded the Scottish case or the example to follow when exercising the right to self-determination.
READ MORE: Activist who took Scottish independence bid to UK Supreme Court sounds warning
“For us, Scotland is the model. We have always said we wanted to do the same but unfortunately the Spanish government and the Spanish authorities did not behave like the British government back in [2014, when Scotland first voted on independence].”
The court case will be determined on the basis of law, but Sole said independence was ultimately a political decision – though the Spanish state has effectively outlawed votes on secession, telling opponents they must first change the country’s constitution before they are allowed to hold referendums on independence.
The Catalonian independence movement “already know the answer” to the question of a referendum, he said, after the 2017 vote was declared unlawful and resulted in a crack-down by the Spanish government.
While Catalonia itself cannot “follow” Scotland’s example, because the avenues in the UK are so far not entirely blocked, the region – which spans the eastern coast and interior of Spain as well as islands such as Majorca and parts of southern France – is interested in developments here because they show there are different ways of achieving the goal of independence, Sole added.
He said: “Whatever the legal opinion is finally, Scotland is a nation, every nation has the right to self-determination, so keep going to find ways to give a voice and a say and a vote to the people.
“This is a matter of democratic rights, it is a matter of democracy.
“If the judgement goes against the interests of the Scottish Government and Parliament, keep putting pressure on the British institutions.”
Ander Larunbe, a Basque independence supporter from Pamplona who has links to the Scottish Yes movement, said his nation was still laying the groundwork for independence, and the area was still struggling to gain rights it had been promised more than 40 years ago.
He said there was widespread support for Basque leaving Spain and that across Europe, left-wing independence movements were gaining traction, in opposition to inward-looking right-wing governments.
Larunbe added: “We understand the rationale of why it’s been taken there [to the Supreme Court].
“But it seems to be a symptom of a lack of political will on the part of the UK Government and the UK institutions to allow nations contained within the UK to decide about their own future. In a sense, it represents a failure of politics from the side of the Tory government.
READ MORE: 'Grow a backbone': Mhairi Black challenges Scottish Tories to back Liz Truss resignation calls
“There are a number of nations – Scotland, Ireland, Flanders, Catalonia, the Basque Country, perhaps even Corsica – that have seen for decades but in the last few years especially, a strengthening of pro-sovereignty, pro-independence, pro-right to decide movements.
“And interestingly these movements and parties are progressive. Whereas we see that the old nation-state nationalisms are going further and further to the right, which is a very worrying trend.”
There is a “fear or refusal” across the continent to confront debates about sovereignty and the right to self-determination in an “open and democratic manner”, according to Larunbe.
He added: “It behoves us, independence movements, to make the conversation so strong and backed in the electoral terms and the grassroots terms, to make the case…for democracy and eventually, for independence itself.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here