SCOTTISH independence cannot be compared to the “back-of-a-fag-packet” plans for Brexit, an SNP minister has said.
Europe Minister Neil Gray’s comments come after Nicola Sturgeon unveiled her plans for the economy in an independent Scotland, with the third in a series of papers designed to refresh the prospectus for an independent Scotland.
The First Minister said Scotland would continue to use Sterling after a Yes vote, only moving to a new Scottish pound when a number of requirements are met, including when the country is fiscally sustainable.
Sturgeon repeatedly refused to say how long that period would last, but intimated in an answer to one journalist that she hoped it would be less than five years.
READ MORE: What to make of the First Minister's gradualist plan for Scotland's economy
In the economic prospectus, the Scottish Government said the transition period's length and management would be a case for the Scottish Parliament.
The First Minister also said there would be border checks on two major trunk roads and rail freight terminals between Scotland and England in the event of the country gaining EU membership.
She also said renewable energy would be the “bedrock” of the economy of an independent Scotland as North Sea revenues decline.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday, Gray rejected comparisons to the Brexit campaign.
“We have produced already three prospectus papers, we’ve got more to come in the series, where we’re setting out the case to the people of Scotland, giving them the information so they can make an informed choice,” Gray said on Good Morning Scotland.
“It’s not possible to compare the well-informed choice that people in Scotland are going to make over independence with the back-of-a-fag-packet case that was presented to people before the Brexit referendum.”
He added: “We’ve got a plan not just to put to the people of Scotland in terms of a choice to make, but also one that would inform our state building after a Yes vote in an independence referendum.”
No unified prospectus was put forward before the 2016 referendum on leaving the EU.
When asked if he believes Monday’s paper will shift opinion in favour of independence, Gray simply said: “Yes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel