DOUGLAS Ross has been panned for an “absurd” comparison likening an independent Scotland to the economic crises faced by Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
The Scottish Tory leader suggested that “hundreds of thousands” of people could end up “fleeing” Scotland after a Yes vote to escape financial turmoil.
The SNP hit back at Ross after his attacks, which focused on the economic prospectus for an independent Scotland which was published by the First Minister on Monday.
The “stronger economy with independence” paper was the third in a series laying the framework for an independent Scotland. It covered controversial areas such as the border, the labour market, and currency.
READ MORE: Commentators have their say on the new Scottish independence paper
The paper said that Scotland would continue to use the pound sterling after a Yes vote, transitioning to a new “Scottish pound” at an unspecified time in the future once the conditions are correct.
Ross claimed that the economic plan would leave Scotland “rudderless” as any new central bank would lack key powers such as issuing currency or adjusting interest rates.
He went on: “It's clear what that would mean. At national level, everything from macroeconomic policy to exports to inward investment, and at a personal one, everything from your mortgage rate, your pension and the price of food would have no effective safeguards.
“We've seen what can happen in countries from Zimbabwe to Venezuela. If even the UK, one of the world's five or six largest economies and a leading member of the G7, can have a serious economic reaction; the lesson from those nations is that, without the power to correct it, the outcome can be hyperinflation and hundreds of thousands of people fleeing near-total economic collapse.”
SNP MP Steven Bonnar branded Ross’s claims “pathetic”. His MSP colleague, Michelle Thomson, said the comparison was “insulting”.
Thomson, the MSP for Falkirk East, said: "It must be hard for Douglas Ross to raise his head with the amount of brass neck he is now carrying – perhaps that's why he can't see the catastrophic damage that Westminster is doing to Scotland's people and economy.
"Quite frankly, this absurd comparison is insulting and only serves to show why you can’t take a word Douglas Ross says seriously.
"It is indisputable that the huge threat to people's mortgages and pensions right now is coming from the calamitous decisions taken by a government Scotland did not vote for in Westminster – decisions that are compounding a crippling cost of living crisis, leaving households across Scotland struggling to get by.”
Liz Truss (above), who won a protracted Tory leadership battle over the summer, is facing calls to quit from within her own party after a disastrous “mini-Budget” saw the Bank of England intervene to prop up pensions funds.
There are warnings that millions of UK residents could see their mortgage payments rise by hundreds of pounds a month by the end of 2024, with the issue compounded by the lingering impacts of the Tory government’s policy announcements (which have now been almost entirely scrapped).
READ MORE: Majority of Tory members want Liz Truss to quit as Prime Minister, polling finds
Thomson argued that the paper looked at how Scotland’s economy could be made to work for everyone.
She said: "The Scottish Government's paper sets out an approach that can be taken to secure fiscal stability, sustainability and a wellbeing economy that works for everyone in Scotland.
"The question Douglas Ross and the Tories have no answer to is why Scotland should be shackled to Westminster decline, damage, and woeful mismanagement when it's clear Scotland can do far better free from Westminster control."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel