A “DISTURBING” benefits assessment with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) left an MSP feeling “sick” after a staff member repeatedly asked “judgemental” questions about her family member’s disability, she has told The National.
SNP MSP Karen Adam was speaking to the DWP as part of a Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessment for a family member who is unable to look after themselves.
Her relative had been receiving the benefit – which helps with living costs if you have a long-term health condition – for seven years after being diagnosed as neurodivergent.
And so she said she “felt sick” when the staff member on the other end of the phone began asking whether the family member couldn’t clean themselves and their home because they “couldn’t be bothered”.
Adam – who said the staff member “snapped” at her over the phone - was also taken aback by them asking whether her relative had ever tried to “commit suicide”.
READ MORE: Tory MSP sends warning to Liz Truss ahead of crunch ERG meeting
Adam said: “We were sat on the sofa and I put my phone on loudspeaker on the table and she [the staff member] asked if I could tell her if my family member was able to clean themselves and their home.
“I said no and they get help to do that and then she said ‘just to let you know that won’t be part of the assessment’ and I just said that was weird.
“She snapped back and said it wasn’t weird. I also wondered why she was asking if it wasn’t part of the assessment.
“She then said there were many people who don’t look after themselves and their houses because they’ve been brought up like that, and my jaw just dropped.
“Then she said ‘just to let you know if you’re going to keep arguing points like this, this time will be taken off someone else’s assessment’.
“I was so taken aback by how horrible she was being and the things she was saying. I honestly thought it was a prank at points.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at any price you can afford
“She then asked if they had ever tried to commit suicide. I just thought that’s language we tend not to try and use anymore, but I didn’t say that out loud.
“I asked them had they ever tried to take their own life, and I felt like breaking down at that point. I thought they weren’t going to tell me and if they had then this might be triggering for them.”
Adam said the verbal assessment had only happened because she was told she had made a mistake on an assessment form that had been sent out for the claimant.
The Banffshire and Buchan Coast MSP said the call was so mortifying she had to try and stop her relative from walking away because they were left feeling so uncomfortable.
Although Adam’s relative has been told they will continue receiving payments until a decision has been made on the assessment, there’s now no knowing whether the PIP instalments will be cut off at that point.
Adam added: “She had no duty of care to who she was talking to. I had to stop them from walking away, because they are so uncomfortable with these things anyway.
“She was so judgemental throughout the whole thing and I felt so sick.”
Adam said she had dealt with Social Security Scotland on several occasions and described it as a "totally different experience" to talking with the DWP.
Social Security Scotland was set up in 2018 to create a benefits system based on dignity, respect and fairness - with the DWP system having been criticised repeatedly for carrying out degrading assessments.
Adam said staff at Social Security Scotland act as if they want to make sure claimants get what they are entitled to, whereas she feels the DWP does the opposite.
The DWP has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel