NADINE Dorries and Jacob Rees-Mogg are on the warpath to bring back Boris Johnson as prime minister – claiming only he can beat Labour at the next election.
Both have bizarrely been sharing graphs and charts this morning showing the ex-PM would be defeated by Keir Starmer – crucially by smaller margins than his rival Tory leadership candidates.
Research carried out by pollsters Redfield and Wilton shared by the Bring Back Boris Twitter account, shows Starmer outperforming Johnson, breezing past Rishi Sunak and trouncing Penny Mordaunt.
If Rishi Sunak were to win, the focus of the privileges committee I am absolutely certain would move straight onto Rishi Sunak and what he knew - in order to embolden Labours call for a general election. With Rishi we will be in general election territory within weeks.
— Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) October 23, 2022
The key is that the Labour leader has a slightly smaller lead on Johnson (43% to 39%). Convincing it is not, but they need something.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak looks set to be prime minister as he wins key Brexiteers' backing
Dorries also boldly claimed that if Sunak were to win, the Partygate scandal could topple him.
That wouldn’t trouble Johnson, obviously, who famously got off Scot-free in the police investigation into Downing Street lawbreaking during the pandemic.
She said with Sunak, the country would be in “General Election territory within weeks” – apparently choosing to ignore the exact same bad smell which hangs around her favourite to win.
Boris is a winner. https://t.co/D7OmVt1S7a
— Jacob Rees-Mogg (@Jacob_Rees_Mogg) October 23, 2022
She also shared a poll for the Mail on Sunday which showed Johnson losing an election against Starmer (as well as all other leadership contenders and others thrown in for good measure) which some bright spark had captioned “Boris doesn’t lose elections”.
Rees-Mogg for his part shared the Redfield and Wilton graphic – again showing Johnson losing – with the caption “Boris is a winner”.
It is a feat of magical thinking for the Tory faithful that their former boss can, like a last Cincinnatus, return from his beach towel and lead the country back from the brink.
Magical thinking also led outgoing PM Liz Truss to think the markets would back her bonkers plans to borrow wads of cash to hand tax cuts to the richest in society. Remind us how that one went?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel