THE Scottish Parliament has begrudgingly given its consent to the UK Government’s energy price support bill, with ministers adding that it’s “better than nothing”.
The Westminster legislation will enshrine in law the Tory government’s energy price guarantee - which new Chancellor Jeremy Hunt cut last week from being in effect for two years to just six months.
Hunt has claimed it will be replaced with a more targeted approach, as he keeps the top Treasury job amid new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s reshuffle.
MSPs voted unanimously to pass the Energy Prices Bill which is currently in its final stages at Westminster after an expedited process.
READ MORE: Cabinet reshuffle so far: Who's in and who's out as Rishi Sunak becomes PM
Moving the legislative consent motion in Holyrood, Scottish Government minister Patrick Harvie said the bill was “far less than it might be” and that the parliament faced “challenging timescales” to review the legislation.
He told MSPs: “I would like to express the hope that this forced regeneration at the top of the UK Government might also compel a reappraisal of the glaring gaps in its energy policies.
“A prime example of a step in the right direction would be an immediate commitment to require and fund a major programme of energy efficiency measures and improvements.
“This would not only make homes more comfortable and affordable to heat, it would improve our environment and security of supply as well, by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and indeed reduce the power exercised at the whim of countries such as Russia and its current leader.
“While I would again reflect that the Energy Prices Bill is far less than it might be with the powers behind its creation available to this parliament, it remains, better than nothing.
“Consenting to this motion will allow the people of Scotland who are currently struggling to pay their energy bills and heat their homes to receive desperately needed financial assistance as quickly as possible.”
Harvie had earlier argued that the Scottish Parliament could take “vital action” if it had powers to make decisions on energy policy, currently reserved to Westminster.
He added: “That frustration is heightened today by the challenging timescales within which we’ve had to work in order to allow parliament to consider the implications for Scotland.”
READ MORE: SNP bid to disrupt Westminster proceedings with rare private sitting is thwarted
Scottish Tory MSP Liam Kerr said his party welcomed the bill, adding: “It will provide much-needed support for households and businesses right across the UK.
“No one has been unaffected by the eye-watering rise in wholesale prices of gas and oil in the past couple of years.”
Kerr also said of the six-month term: “I feel that is the right length of time to get us through the winter then have a review which will ensure the mechanism can be stress tested against what was projected, what was intended and what we have actually seen by that point in practice during the winter months and then to decide what is the best and most productive mechanism going forward.”
Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth said his party supported the legislative consent motion “even if the Bill was described as a landmark, two-year, price guarantee but has now been shredded to a six-month freeze”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel