THE Home Office has yet to process 96 per cent of asylum claims made by migrants who crossed the Channel last year, MPs have been told.
Just 4% of applications submitted by migrants making the journey in 2021 have been completed, the UK Government department’s officials have revealed.
Of those completed, 85% were granted refugee status or another protection status, the Commons Home Affairs Committee heard.
Officials also said more than 38,000 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel in over 900 boats in 2022 to date, compared with 28,526 last year.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at the price you can afford
Dan Hobbs, the Home Office’s director of asylum, protection and enforcement, told the committee there is a “challenge in processing asylum claims in a timely way at present” and confirmed only a “small proportion” of last year’s arrivals had been granted asylum.
Paula Barker, Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, said: “I see first hand day in day out, and so do my team, the utter chaos in dealing with the Home Office with asylum claims.
“Some of my constituents who have or are going through the process are reporting to my office that they haven’t had an interview for two years."
Sabir Zazai, chief executive of the Scottish Refugee Council: “The Home Office’s chronically slow asylum decision system is simply not acceptable.
"We must remember that behind every statistic is a person who just wants to receive a decision so they can move on with rebuilding their lives.
“We must also challenge the UK Government’s misleading narrative around small boat crossings. We know that the vast majority of people who risk their lives by making these dangerous journeys do so to seek safety, and that they have arrived from countries where war, terror and persecution can be a daily reality.
“The UK Government is failing to invest in any safe routes to protection for people fleeing conflict around the globe. We urgently need more safe routes to sanctuary."
During the session, officials also said that the interception rate made by French police of migrants attempting the crossing had fallen.
Last year the rate was about 50% and this year it has dropped to 42.5%, clandestine Channel threat commander Dan O’Mahoney said.
READ MORE: Suella Braverman to call on French to stop more boats crossing Channel
He accepted this was a lower percentage but stressed it was a “much, much bigger number”, telling how French authorities had stopped 28,000 migrants crossing the Channel and intercepted and destroyed 1,072 boats so far this year.
“I should put on record my thanks to the French … this is around double what they managed to achieve last year, so that is really, really significant,” O’Mahoney said.
But he added: “It is correct to say that migrants can attempt to cross on more than one occasion and therefore those 28,000 migrants may not be individual, different migrants, so it’s 28,000 attempts.”
Work by the UK and French authorities have led to 55 serious organised crime gangs behind such crossings being “dismantled” since a joint intelligence cell was set up in France a couple of years ago, he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel