RISHI Sunak has been asked to explain why state schools are “not good enough” – as he spends more than £63,000 every year sending his children to exclusive private schools.
The Prime Minister – who has an extreme wealth that opponents say makes it impossible for him to relate to the average person – has two young daughters. He spends more than double the median wage of a UK worker (£31,285) on their private education every year.
READ MORE: 'Halloween come early’: Rishi Sunak panned for 'nightmare' Cabinet appointments
One goes to an exclusive boarding school charging annual fees of £41,250, while the other goes to a school charging £22,350 every year, according to multiple reports.
Sunak has also faced criticism for appointing a Cabinet in which 65% of its members went to a private school – more than nine times the number in the general population. Sunak himself went to the exclusive Winchester College, which currently charges £45,936 per year for pupils boarding.
The SNP’s education spokesperson at Westminster, Carol Monaghan, told The National that Sunak should send his children to state school to “clearly demonstrate that he has an interest in improving the educational experience and outcomes of all young people in England”.
The Glasgow North West MP (below) said: “Rishi Sunak must show he is not an out-of-touch multi-millionaire and that he understands the increasing financial pressures state schools are facing.
“Whilst he has the right to send his children to a school of his choosing, it does beg the question why he feels that this must be a private school. If state schools are not good enough for his own daughters, then he must make it his priority to improve them.
“As it is, we now have a Prime Minister who believes other people’s children can put up with poorly funded schools, whilst he spends £22,000 per year on education for his own daughters.
“By sending his daughters to a state school he would clearly demonstrate that he has an interest in improving the educational experience and outcomes of all young people in England.
“Per-pupil spending in state schools in England currently sits at only £6600 per annum. Mr Sunak should increase this to match the per-pupil spending in Scotland and should follow the Scottish Government’s lead by removing private schools’ charitable status.”
READ MORE: Scotland tops the charts with the best educated workforce in Europe
Analysis from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) reported in 2021 that Scotland had the highest per pupil spend of anywhere in the UK, at £7600 per child per year. This was found to be around £800 more than spending in Wales, England, and Northern Ireland.
Labour MP Jess Phillips issued a similar challenge to the new Prime Minister, writing on Twitter: “I assume that Sunak will ensure that he understands the country he wants to govern by ensuring that his family get all their healthcare from the NHS and that he would send his children to school alongside your children in a state school.”
I assume that Sunak will ensure that he understands the country he wants to govern by ensuring that his family get all their healthcare from the NHS and that he would send his children to school alongside your children in a state school.
— Jess Phillips MP (@jessphillips) October 24, 2022
In terms of his Cabinet, 65% of the ministers Sunak has appointed had a private education including his three most senior colleagues: Chancellor Jeremy Hunt (Charterhouse School in Surrey), Foreign Secretary James Cleverly (Colfe’s School in Greenwich, south-east London), and Home Secretary Suella Braverman (Heathfield School in Pinner, north-west London).
READ MORE: PM accused of 'sleazy backroom deal' to win power by appointing Suella Braverman
The proportion is broadly similar to Liz Truss’s Cabinet (68%) and Boris Johnson’s first Cabinet (64%), but much higher than the level in Theresa May’s 2016 Cabinet (30%).
It is also up on the figure for David Cameron’s 2015 Cabinet (50%) and well above the 32% in Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s Cabinets, though close to the 62% in the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition in 2010.
The analysis has been published by social mobility charity The Sutton Trust, and it also shows nearly a quarter (23%) of Sunak’s Cabinet went to a comprehensive school while one in 10 attended a grammar school.
Among those who went to a comprehensive are Leader of the Commons Penny Mordaunt, Transport Secretary Mark Harper and – perhaps symbolically – Education Secretary Gillian Keegan.
Sir Peter Lampl, founder and chairman of the Sutton Trust, said: “Rishi Sunak faces unprecedented challenges as he enters No 10.
“In his new Cabinet, 65% went to private schools – over nine times the number in the general population – and 45% went to Oxbridge, more than double the average for all MPs.
“While his Cabinet is marginally more representative than Truss’s, Tuesday’s appointments highlight how unevenly spread opportunities to enter the most prestigious positions continue to be.
“Making the most of Britain’s talent regardless of background must be a priority.”
Sunak continues the tradition of nearly every UK prime minister since the Second World War having studied at Oxford University.
The one exception is Gordon Brown, who went to Edinburgh University.
Downing Street has been contacted for comment.
How is the energy crisis affecting your business?
Energy prices are skyrocketing across the UK, with the price cap set to hit more than £3500 in October. But a lesser told story is the effect soaring energy bills can have on small businesses. Many firms in Scotland are likely to be forced out of business as rising costs make it unviable. If your small business is going through tough times thanks to sky-high energy bills, let us know.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel