THE number of people in Scotland living with a “welfare guardian” has more than doubled in the last decade, prompting calls for law reform.
A welfare guardian is appointed by a court to help a person who lacks capacity to takes decisions for themselves.
A relative usually takes the role, but it can also be someone from a local authority.
The system is most commonly used for people with learning disabilities or those with dementia.
A total of 17,101 people in Scotland were living with a welfare guardianship order by March this year, according to data published in a new report by the Mental Welfare Commission (MWC) released on Thursday.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak challenged over private schooling of daughters and Cabinet
This figure is more than twice what it was in 2012 – 6400 – and it is the highest ever on record.
Of all granted guardianship orders in the last year, 94% were new orders and 6% were renewals.
Some of the latest data from MWC was affected by temporary measures introduced during the pandemic, but the overall trend in rising numbers continued.
The increase has led to complications for individuals, families and authorities using or hoping to use the welfare guardianship system, and has prompted calls for reform to help keep the process straightforward.
Suzanne McGuinness, executive director at MWC, said: “People who lack capacity because of learning disability, dementia or other conditions are some of the most vulnerable individuals in our community and have a right to be protected by the law.
“But the constant rise in use of welfare guardianship – and the difficulties this can cause for individuals, families and authorities – has led many, including the Commission, to support proposals for reform of the system, to make it less complex and better for the individual.”
She said new measures will be looked at when the MWC provides a detailed response to the recently-published Scottish Mental Health Law Review.
An MWC spokesperson added: “The question of how best to manage situations in which welfare guardianship currently come into use is part of that review.
“We will give a detailed response to the complete review document, but for now we can say that we agree with the review that it could be managed better and this is a priority. And we agree with their focus on the individual, not the process.”
Private guardians (meaning relatives or friends as opposed to local authorities) accounted for 73% of all welfare guardianships granted this year, which was similar to previous years, according to the MWC report.
READ MORE: Scottish schools told to ignore 'demeaning' English advice on trans kids
The most common primary diagnosis for those being cared for was learning disability (46%), followed by dementia (39%).
Most of the granted orders were for a period of five years or less (80%), while 16% were for six years or longer, and 4% were indefinite orders.
Kevin Stewart, Holyrood’s minister for mental wellbeing, said: “The Scottish Mental Health Law Review was tasked with reviewing our mental health and incapacity legislation in light of developments in international human rights, including the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and to consider where improvements could be made.
“Given the scope and complexity of the review, we will take time to carefully consider the recommendations on improvements to the guardianship process to help improve people’s experience of care and ensure that adults with impaired capacity are supported to maximise their decision-making ability.
“We will continue to promote supported decision making, enabling people to make their own decisions with support and where possible without the need for a guardianship order.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel