PRIME Minister Rishi Sunak has demoted allies of his predecessor Liz Truss and rewarded his own supporters as he ploughed on with a ministerial shake-up.
Sunak was already facing scrutiny over his decision to re-appoint Suella Braverman as Home Secretary as he tore up Truss’s growth plan and delayed the highly anticipated autumn budget.
The SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford was amongst those to criticise the Prime Minister’s appointment of Braverman as Home Secretary.
Conservative Party chairman Nadhim Zahawi said the Prime Minister was right to give her a shot at “redemption” six days after she was forced out by Liz Truss over a security breach.
Sunak’s attempt to unite the Tories is under strain, with Zahawi’s predecessor, Sir Jake Berry, alleging “multiple breaches” of the Ministerial Code.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at the price you can afford
He also reimposed the fracking ban in England that had been controversially scrapped by Truss and was reviewing key spending commitments.
This included increasing state pensions in line with soaring inflation in a major overhaul of Government strategy.
The reshuffle continued with the announcement of several junior appointments on Wednesday evening, with Truss allies and former Cabinet attendees Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Chris Philp accepting new, less prominent Government roles.
There were also jobs for Sunak loyalists Alex Chalk, Lucy Frazer and Helen Whately, while former long-serving schools minister Nick Gibb returned to the Department for Education, joined by senior Tory and vocal Truss critic Robert Halfon.
Sunak brushed off opposition demands for an immediate general election as he pledged to rebuild the public finances in a “fair and compassionate” way and to rectify the former prime minister's “mistakes”.
As he settles into his new role at the helm of the Tory party, he is said to be preparing a radical set of education reforms.
Plans reported by The Times echoed his leadership pledges to create a Russell Group of world-class technical colleges and introduce a “British Baccalaureate” that would prevent students from dropping maths and English at 16.
Elsewhere, the PM was facing pressure to launch an official inquiry into Braverman breaking the ministerial code by sharing a sensitive document with a Tory backbencher from a personal email.
Tensions escalated on Wednesday evening as former Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry claimed she had committed “multiple breaches” of the rules.
The Home Secretary is now in line for lessons from MI5 on what information she can and cannot share, according to The Times.
Earlier, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt delayed his Halloween budget setting out the measures to get the UK’s deficit under control to November 17 to take into account the latest economic forecasts.
Downing Street was refusing to commit to key pledges on the triple lock on state pensions and increasing defence spending to 3% of GDP by 2030 as Sunak and Hunt complete their review.
Just last week Truss insisted she was “completely committed” to the manifesto pledge on pensions after facing a backlash when No 10 suggested it may be scrapped.
On Wednesday, Sunak’s press secretary refused to “comment ahead of any fiscal statements or budgets” as she declined to say whether payments will increase in April in line with inflation, at more than 10%.
“But what I can say is he has shown through his record as Chancellor is that he will do what’s right and compassionate for the most vulnerable,” she said.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak challenged over private schooling of daughters and Cabinet
Tory MP Maria Caulfield, who previously declared she would not vote to end the triple lock when Downing Street indicated it could be ditched, pointed to Sunak’s assurance that he will deliver on the 2019 manifesto.
She told Sky News’ The Take with Sophy Ridge: “It was in our manifesto to keep the triple lock and Rishi was also very clear today that he’s a Prime Minister that’s standing on that 2019 manifesto, and he wants to deliver it.”
She said “of course” there cannot be a “running commentary” on the upcoming budget, but what concerns her is that when the Government “doesn’t confirm one way or the other”, then “speculation mounts”, and “people start to worry”.
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, who survived Sunak’s reshuffle in the same role, would be on resignation watch if the Government backtracks on the defence spending commitment.
Central to Truss’s growth-boosting vision were investment zones where planning restrictions are relaxed, a “Big Bang 2.0” programme of deregulation of the financial services sector, the scrapping of environmental protections and allowing in more skilled migrants.
But Ms Truss’s official spokesman said: “There are no plans for supply-side reforms as we previously discussed.
“That’s not to say there won’t be elements the Chancellor may or may not wish to come forward with in his autumn statement.”
At Sunak’s combative first Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir Starmer attacked the PM’s controversial decision to reappoint Braverman as Home Secretary just six days after she was forced to resign over the security breach.
The Labour leader said it was a sign of the weakness of his position that he had to do a “grubby deal” with a prominent figure on the Tory right to ensure he gained the leadership this time around.
He also taunted the new premier over his defeat by Truss in the last leadership contest over the summer.
“The only time he ran in a competitive election he got trounced by the former prime minister, who herself got beaten by a lettuce,” Sir Keir said.
“So why doesn’t he put it to the test, let working people have their say and call a general election?”
Sunak responded that he had a mandate based on the Conservative Party manifesto on which they won the 2019 election.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel