ELON Musk has shared a baseless far-right conspiracy theory on Twitter about the attack suffered by Paul Pelosi just days after buying the social media platform.
The tech billionaire completed his purchase of the platform on Thursday amid promises that he would champion free speech and reduce content moderation.
And in the wake of the husband of American politician Nancy Pelosi being attacked with a hammer in his home by an intruder, Musk replied to a tweet from Hillary Clinton raising concerns over inflammatory political discourse with a far-right conspiracy theory.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at the price you can afford
On Saturday, Clinton criticised members of the Republican Party for disseminating “hate and deranged conspiracy theories” after it was revealed that Paul Pelosi’s alleged attacker had been spreading far-right conspiracies online in the lead-up to the attack.
The former secretary of state tweeted: “The Republican Party and its mouthpieces now regularly spread hate and deranged conspiracy theories. It is shocking, but not surprising, that violence is the result.
“As citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and the actions that follow.”
The Republican Party and its mouthpieces now regularly spread hate and deranged conspiracy theories. It is shocking, but not surprising, that violence is the result. As citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and the actions that follow.https://t.co/MQor4NDFeE
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 29, 2022
Replying to Clinton on Sunday, Musk suggested to his 112 million followers that the attack that left the 82-year-old in hospital was not what it seemed.
He wrote: “There is a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye.”
Musk had no further explanation of his statement, except for a link to an article that claimed, without evidence, that Paul Pelosi had been drunk and met his alleged attacker in a gay bar.
The Twitter boss deleted his reply hours later.
The article in his reply referred to one of a number of far-right conspiracies that were spread online in the wake of the attack which left Paul Pelosi requiring surgery for a fractured skull.
Nancy Pelosi was not home at the time of the attack as she was in Washington DC.
Chief of the San Francisco Police William Scott described the incident as “intentional” and “not a random act”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel