ESTIMATED costs around the National Care Service Bill are “likely to significantly understate” the actual costs which could face the Scottish Government, Audit Scotland has said.
The independent body will give evidence on the financial memorandum of the bill on Tuesday, but has already raised a number of concerns in a written submission to the Finance and Public Administration Committee.
Last week, SNP MSPs on the committee tore into government officials as they criticised a lack of clarity within the document. Convener Kenneth Gibson said the policy seemed like a “sledgehammer to crack a nut”.
Meanwhile, the SNP’s Michelle Thomson said she was “surprised by the complete lack of fundamentals” in the financial memorandum and insisted she had no confidence in its accuracy.
The bill would centralise £4.3 billion of public spending – one third of Scottish councils’ total budget – and will aim to improve the consistency and quality of social care services.
A table within the financial memorandum shows wide-ranging estimates for the costs of bill provisions.
READ MORE: Scottish councils to bid against private firms for National Care Service funding
It states in 2022-23, the total estimated costs of bill provisions could be anything between £24 million and £36m, and there are even larger gaps projected for the following years.
Audit Scotland has said there are a number of costs associated with measures in the bill that are yet to be assessed and has insisted the overall cost of the measures will be “significantly above the amounts currently assessed”.
The written submission says: “There are a number of costs associated with the measures set out in the bill that have yet to be assessed.
“The Scottish Government has recognised this providing a broad description of the anticipated cost and the difficulty in assessing it at this stage.
READ MORE: New poll shows significant progress in reducing mental health stigma
“In some of these the potential for additional cost is significant and taken together it is likely that the overall cost of the measures will be significantly above the amounts currently assessed.
“In our view, the potential cost summarised are likely to significantly understate the margin of uncertainty and range of potential costs of the bill measures.”
Legislation to establish an NCS was published earlier this year, but ministers have stressed it is only a “framework”.
Audit Scotland has suggested the estimated costs do not thoroughly take into account changes and increasing volatility of inflation expectations and has laid out a number of areas where costs have not yet been assessed, which it says “have the potential to add significantly to the overall costs reported and are not currently reflected in the assessed margin of uncertainty.”
The submission added: “The inflation indices applied by the Scottish Government are set out in the last bullet of paragraph 30 [in the financial memorandum].
“These are taken from ONS [Office for National Statistics] publications but more recent information on actual and forecast inflation are well ahead of the assumptions used.
“There is significant uncertainty about the future path of overall inflation measures and how this translates to public sector pay and other costs, but in our view the margin of uncertainty in the figures is likely to be significantly understated as a result.”
Areas where costs have not been assessed include the cost of any national care boards, transition costs for local authorities and health boards, the impact of changes to VAT treatment, the impact of any change to pension scheme arrangements and the extent of potential changes to capital investment and maintenance costs.
Donna Bell, director of social care and National Care Service development, denied there were any issues with the way the bill had been developed when speaking to the committee last week and said risks were being taken into account.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel