NICOLA Sturgeon has “categorically” denied “jobs for the boys” accusations over the awarding of troubled contracts to build CalMac ferries to a prominent independence supporter.
The First Minister was grilled by MSPs over the controversial decision to give Ferguson Marine the contract to build two ferries which are now due to be delivered more than five years late and two and a half times over budget.
Scottish tycoon Jim McColl, a high-profile independence supporter who was seen as close with former first minister Alex Salmond, bought the Ferguson Marine Engineering Limited (FMEL) yard in Port Glasgow a year before the CalMac contract was awarded.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon hit back at Tory claims of 'dodgy' dealing around the Ferguson Marine ferry contract at a Holyrood committee on Friday 👇 pic.twitter.com/WlsmP9se7S
— The National (@ScotNational) November 4, 2022
Sharon Dowey, the Conservative deputy chair of Holyrood’s public audit committee, suggested McColl being awarded the contract was evidence of cronyism and a “jobs for the boys” attitude within the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: BBC presenter 'failed to meet impartiality standards' with Tory leadership race comments
Sturgeon refuted the claims in the strongest terms and said she was unaware of concerns raised by Caledonia Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL) about the suitability of Ferguson Marine for the building.
Dowey asked: “Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract to FMEL, was it a kind of jobs for the boys? There’s obviously been talk of the relationship between the Scottish Government and Jim McColl.
“Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract.”
The First Minister suggested the “jobs for the boys” claim was a “pejorative” accusation and one she “completely and utterly” refuted.
She added that “as long as it’s all done by the book” all politicians would be happy to see Scottish contracts awarded to Scottish companies and preserve jobs.
The Scottish Government has repeatedly defended itself over the ferries fiasco saying that its actions – including eventually nationalising the yard – prevented the loss of hundreds of jobs in Inverclyde.
“If you are saying, was there anything untoward in this procurement process in order to somehow inappropriately steer this contract towards FMEL – absolutely not,” Sturgeon said.
READ MORE: King Charles has made 'various threats' to Harry and Meghan over 'damaging' book
The First Minister reiterated her position on the public rescue of Ferguson Marine at the public audit committee on Friday, saying that nationalising the yard was the “only option” to prevent its closure in 2019.
A key issue in the ongoing story around the ferries is why the Scottish Government appeared to ignore concerns from senior civil servants about a clause in the contract which resulted in the state being financially responsible for delays to the project.
This has resulted in taxpayers having to foot the bill for the ballooning costs to the severely delayed project.
Former finance secretary Derek Mackay has taken responsibility for the decision to overrule CMAL officials who were concerned about the lack of a “builder’s refund guarantee” from FMEL, which would have insulated the government from the costs of delays and problems.
Tory MSP Craig Hoy called the process used to award the contract “dodgy” and “fishy” as he suggested the First Minister should quit her role over the fiasco, suggesting she had failed to be “transparent” with the public during the ferries saga.
He also referred to a “cheat sheet” revealed by the BBC which appeared to show that FMEL had been given insider information on how to secure the contract. Sturgeon said she was not aware of “impropriety” in the procurement process but that the Scottish Government was taking the allegations seriously.
“This is a monumental scandal First Minister and it happened on your watch,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel