A FORMER council leader who headed up a "coalition of chaos" with the Tories marched out of a major meeting because he couldn’t get an archaic title bestowed upon one of his allies.
David Fairweather decided to leave a full Angus Council meeting – which included several agenda items on the cost-of-living crisis – after elected members voted against his motion to reinstate the ancient post of Baillie.
The historic civic role – which arose in the Scottish burghs - dates back to the 1300s and is still used in some councils including Dundee.
According to the motion, a Baillie was originally the King’s representative for the administration of the Scottish burghs – which were abolished in the 1970s.
Fairweather's behaviour has been described as "disgraceful" and a "dereliction of duty".
The motion was voted down by the SNP administration along with some other opposition members, much to the disgust of former council leader Fairweather who said to the Provost Brian Boyd: “Councillor Boyd I will no longer refer to you as the Provost until you begin to act like one.
“This decision shames Angus Council. I record my dissent. I will remove myself from this room as a protest to this disgraceful pettiness from the SNP and the two stooges they have got.
“I will go before I say anything more that I regret.”
📺 The former leader of the #CoalitionOfChaos in Angus walks out because the Council did not bestow an archaic title on one of his team.
— Cllr Lloyd Melville (@LloydAMelville) November 3, 2022
🤝 We’re serious about looking after the people of Angus - the opposition are focused on playing games. pic.twitter.com/BEm14W81gO
Fairweather wanted to bestow the title on Tory councillor and ex-Provost Ronnie Proctor.
After he slammed his laptop shut, another councillor can be heard saying Fairweather’s behaviour was “disgraceful”.
Fairweather headed up the previous administration run by the Tories and independents before the SNP took over in May as they gained four seats.
The Conservatives had been plagued by scandal after scandal and their administration has been branded a “coalition of chaos” by other parties.
The SNP group have since been trying to cut back on civic duties within the council to save cash.
SNP councillor Lloyd Melville said Fairweather abandoned his constituents when there were pressing items to discuss, including helping people with financial challenges “due to Conservative economic policy”.
READ MORE: Our year-long pay-what-you-can-afford offer ends at 4PM TODAY
He said: "We felt, very sensibly in my opinion, that the council had a really important agenda to get through for tackling the cost of living, for discussing the financial challenges that we have, in large part due to Conservative economic policy.
“So we took the decision where at a time when people are choosing between heating and eating, we are not going to bestow an archaic title on a member of the opposition.
"I think the actions of Councillor Fairweather at full council were disgraceful.
“I think he has walked out on his duty to his constituents to be there and scrutinise the administration and protect the people of Angus from the cost-of-living pressures they are facing.
"We had really important items to discuss, and to walk out on that shows a real dereliction of duty to the people that you're supposed to be representing."
READ MORE: Game of Thrones actor James Cosmo launches Set in Scotland travel guide
Melville added: “We’re serious about looking after the people of Angus. The opposition are just focused on playing games.”
Following the meeting, Fairweather told the National: “As for important matters, these had already been discussed by the opposition group of which I am a member and actions agreed.
“Cllr Melville would be better placed reviewing his own party’s actions than scrutinising mine.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel