MINISTERS in Edinburgh must fast-track moves to deliver a commissioner for future generations, according to an influential foundation.
A new briefing paper produced by Dunfermline-based Carnegie UK asks the Scottish Government to quickly deliver the legislation that would lead to the creation of the post north of the Border.
Carnegie UK says the moves will lead to policymakers taking more decisions that consider the long-term interests of the people of Scotland. Their call follows the Scottish Government’s Finance Secretary John Swinney outlining £615 million of spending cuts last week.
Sarah Davidson, chief executive of Carnegie UK, said: “Leaders in Scotland have this year been forced to make incredibly tough decisions, often due to circumstances way beyond their control.
“But when faced with difficult choices today, it can be too easy for those in charge to fail to consider the impact on the people of tomorrow. That’s why we want to see the Scottish Government press on with the creation of a Future Generations’ Commissioner to ensure that prioritising collective wellbeing, now and in the future, is at the centre of our public policy.”
A Future Generations’ Commissioner has been in place in Wales since 2016, following the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The role of the commissioner is to be the guardian of future generations. This means helping public bodies and those who make policy in Wales to think about the long-term impact their decisions have.
Carnegie UK argues that the proposed Well-being and Sustainable Development Bill, featured in the 2021 Programme for Government, should include the creation of a Future Generations Commission in Scotland. In addition, they argue these new laws could form the centrepiece of reforms to the Scottish Government’s National Performance Framework.
Davidson added: “The Scottish Government broke ground when they introduced the National Performance Framework in 2007. But now is the time for them to press on to ensure that this important tool is at the heart of decision-making.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel