THE United Kingdom is “incapable of the kind of transformational change” required to tackle the climate crisis, Patrick Harvie has said as he launched the Scottish Greens’ case for independence.
The party’s co-leader told reporters he did not back Yes because of “flags or 300 years of history” but rather as the only vehicle by which Scotland can grapple with the defining issues of the day.
At a launch of the first in a series of papers designed to restate the Scottish Greens’ positions on a range of topics, with a focus on independence, Harvie told attendees at the launch that it was now time for Scotland to “set our sights higher” than the horizon set by the Union.
He said: “It is time for ambitious thinking. It is time for bold and radical action. It is time for independence.
READ MORE: Top Scottish accounts flock to alternative Twitter-style social media
“The situation we are in is far too urgent for business as usual.”
Speaking afterwards, Harvie said a Yes vote “might even have the chance of inspiring those campaigning for transformational change south of the Border”.
Scottish Greens publish new papers on independence
The first of the Scottish Greens’ documents, published in addition to the Scottish Government’s case for independence, sets out in broad brushstrokes the party’s existing positions on issues such as universal basic income, oil and gas and ending the “racist” hostile environment immigration policies of the UK Government.
Co-leader Lorna Slater gave a short speech at Monday’s event, held in Dynamic Earth in Edinburgh, in which she said independence would give Scotland the chance to “be in the room” for key discussions on the planet’s future – such as the COP27, which began on Sunday.
She added: “Independence is not an end in itself. It is just a beginning.
“It would have a huge impact on our ability to tackle the twin crises of climate breakdown and biodiversity loss and build greener and more sustainable communities.”
Later, Harvie told reporters the document was intended to set out the Scottish Greens’ “distinctive” case for independence – suggesting the party had the ability to move the SNP to the left and towards more radical environmental policies.
He said the UK Government acted to consistently “undermine” Holyrood's ability to take action on the climate crisis – citing the Internal Market Act as a key way in which Westminster has legislated against the devolution settlement.
“If I genuinely looked at the UK Government and the UK political landscape and I saw something that was capable of social and economic and environmental transformation, I would at least look at that argument,” he added.
“I don’t support independence because of flags or 300 years of history, I support independence because I am convinced, after looking at the UK, that it is incapable of delivering the kind of transformational change that is required and that independence would open up that possibility.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here